Connecting to CloudFlare, surely its possible.
-
@stephenw10 it certainly does look more like a proxy.
-
Just to refresh the topic, WARP client for freebsd based firewalls eg:. (pfSense, OPNsense), 10+ pages with useful links for Your inspiration…;)
I really frustrated WHY NETGATE IGNORE WARP/WARP+ as fastest (truth) way to have secured VPN/proxied connection that love a lot of pfSense’s users.
Looks like DevTeam making first step (with documenting DoT with CloudFlare and making a lot of links in official docs certainly for CloudFlare’s public DNSs, which are FREE), stop and not making reasonable next step with making WARP/WARP+ CloudFlare client (service) for pfSense!
Really frustrating! Especially there are a lot of ready-to-use code for FreeBSD, that was tested and work well!
-
Please vote for adding CloudFlare WARP/WARP+ client as a package to pfSense.
Thank You all!
-
@stephenw10 said in Connecting to CloudFlare, surely its possible.:
Are you doing everything shown here?:
https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/owg78a/sending_traffic_over_cloudflare_warp/@stephenw10 Is this exactly guide working for You?
If answer are “Yes”:
-
What is bandwidth w/ and w/o WARP (or WARP+ if You have) on the same physical channel?
-
What about STABILITY of work (and how You testing this stability)?
Thanks a lot!
-
-
@NollipfSense said in Connecting to CloudFlare, surely its possible.:
@deanfourie I think a better question would be what about REST API that was promised for pfSense 2.6 but didn't make it? Has pfSense moved away from implementing that strategy? With REST API, it would be very easy to run containers and other micro-services...
Beside the Netgate promises, the idea to running micro-services and especially containers inside pfSense - very bad idea.
I prefer to look on pfSense as solid system with a fraction of 3-rd packages (but VERY WELL TESTED an bug-free!).
