8200 to UDMSE & NAS 10G
-
Netgate 8200 10G LAN1 to UDME 10G WAN - Netgate 10G LAN2 to Synology 10G
Is this right or do I need a switch instead to the NAS?
Thanks,
Defcom5
-
That depends if you need to filter between them. If not a switch is a better option. Otherwise the firewall has to route that and the load will be...large. Though if you're connecting the UDM WAN that will have to route/filter this traffic anyway.
Steve
-
I have a similar setup although my NAS is connected only to the UniFi side of the house. I have a 6100 MAX sitting in front of my UDM-SE in a dual NAT scenario. You might consider getting a UniFi aggregation switch which are only about $250 and give you 8 10Gb fiber ports.
My Netgate appliance is connecting to the UDM-SE via the WAN 10Gb port. Then the UDM connects to the UniFi aggregation switch with the other 10 gig connection. Then I have a 3-port link aggregation group from the Synology NAS to the aggregation switch (30Gb).
