Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    How are packages supported

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion
    40 Posts 7 Posters 3.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      AlternateShadow @SteveITS
      last edited by

      @SteveITS said in How are packages supported:

      Is everyone on this thread able and/or willing to contribute time and expertise?

      What about those of us who contribute money? I'm paying netgate to contribute their time and expertise so I don't have to. My criticism is that there seems to be a discrepancy between what they are selling to their customers and what they are delivering.

      JonathanLeeJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JonathanLeeJ
        JonathanLee
        last edited by

        https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/14998

        This would simplify Squid. I want to help add some code to Squid for this, as soon as I get more experience.

        Make sure to upvote

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JonathanLeeJ
          JonathanLee @AlternateShadow
          last edited by

          @AlternateShadow I agree as I was under the impression Snort's maintainer was paid for his work. I would have donated my Snort subscription cost directly to him knowing this now. But I can't do that, it has no Donation button in Redmine or GitHub. He deserves it. I felt so bad when I learned he donated his time to support it unpaid. It's so professional, clean it's amazing. It was misleading for me.

          Make sure to upvote

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • M
            michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance
            last edited by

            I wish someone from Netgate could respond here and set expectations.

            Im looking at the site and it says that pfsense can do Threat Prevention. But what it really means is you can install it but theres no support for it.

            So if im a business im thinking to myself looking at the website. I can get hardware for a good price and i can get TAC for a good price that should cover me as i roll this out in my datacenter.
            But that same business will discover that there are a ton of caveats. Threat Prevention bugs or features arent supported and you cant open a TAC case for help on that. The correct and accurate response would be to go to the forums and ask for the maintainers help...
            Now the business is wondering why it paid money for a TAC sub where it shouldve instead given the money to the maintainer. Also why is the business relying on unsupported packages even though the website made it seem its part of the overall pfsense package?

            So whos wrong in that situation? The business or Netgate. The answer is obvious but this is the slippery slope of advertising a package you have no control over.
            It needs to be clear to the consumer here. If i bought a SG-6100 in October of 2023 because i am running it in a K12 location and im using Squid...suddenly i get a notification that Squid is being removed from the repo what do i do? Up until recently, Proxy capability was listed on the website. At best this poor marketing. At worst this is shady.

            Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
            Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
            Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
            Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
            JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • tinfoilmattT
              tinfoilmatt
              last edited by

              what is this entire thread on about?

              from netgate.com home page's description of pfSense+:

              "Ideal for home, remote worker, business, and service provider network connectivity and protection

              • Equipped with many router and firewall features typically found only in expensive commercial routers
              • Flexible VPN solution options
              • Known for robustness and stability
              • Highly extensible with 3rd party packages to support block lists, content filtering, intrusion prevention, policy-based routing and more
              • Easy to install and maintain via web GUI
              • Available for premises and cloud deployment"

              emphasis added.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JonathanLeeJ
                JonathanLee
                last edited by JonathanLee

                We must remember the website is dynamic .. It actually advertised Proxy, and IPS/IDS

                912089cd-1927-4940-828e-c47857d9b16c-image.png

                f5e0a887-6932-4b1c-92cb-5fd44e51efe2-image.png

                It has been removed this is why I thought Bill Meeks was getting paid.

                There was also another website that had an image of a family a couple years ago that talked about web caching also said nothing about 3rd party.

                https://www.netgate.com/pfsense-plus-applications/content-filtering

                Make sure to upvote

                tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • tinfoilmattT
                  tinfoilmatt @JonathanLee
                  last edited by

                  This post is deleted!
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JonathanLeeJ
                    JonathanLee
                    last edited by JonathanLee

                    bc1ef02d-df1f-4c69-9723-4b8d4c969bd1-image.png

                    5284c3fa-9354-4359-960f-ffb6eace95d3-image.png

                    baa43187-1d9b-4c21-a78b-fdbfdfbbf417-image.png

                    So yes, it was advertised to me directly from Netgate. As a student I thought YES this is what I need we are talking about this and doing labs with Palo Alto firewalls with this right now. I used my grant to get the firewall from Netgate because of this advertisement seen here.

                    a year later...

                    aff16718-bde1-429e-a6c2-201b374021e0-image.png

                    Who knows, I just wish I could have given my subscription to Snort rules to Bill and kept the free rules now that I know this.

                    This is why I am stuck on 23.05.01, they changed the platform because of some issues. It took a lot of years for me to get it working correctly. Kind of sad.

                    Make sure to upvote

                    tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JonathanLeeJ
                      JonathanLee
                      last edited by

                      They really need a donate to maintainer button somewhere that would make it clear.

                      Make sure to upvote

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • tinfoilmattT
                        tinfoilmatt @JonathanLee
                        last edited by

                        @JonathanLee i personally wouldn't share that story if it were me. it certainly doesn't land, in my opinion, the way you seem to think it should.

                        "pfSense Plus software enables web (HTTP and HTTPS) proxy functions via Squid [ . . . ], SquidGuard [ . . . ] and Lightsquid [ . . . ] packages."

                        emphasis added.

                        the home page read exactly the same as i've quoted on January 21, 2023.

                        the Complete List of Supported Packages of the same date indicated that only Lightsquid was "Maintained by Netgate." both Squid and SquidGuard were noted as "Netgate TAC Support can only assist with the installation of this package. Netgate Professional Services can assist with custom configurations."

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @tinfoilmatt
                          last edited by

                          @cyberconsultants
                          The problem is how to interpret the support of these packages. It's not clear as i documented in a few threads as to what is covered under a TAC sub vs what is actually covered under supported packages. Also as documented there are times where the netgate team would assist in the support of the non-supported packages such as pfBlockerNG.
                          Also myself and another poster showed examples of how to properly document, so there is no confusion to consumers, what is supported and what isnt.

                          So at the end of the day what is the expected coverage level of any of these pkgs? Its unclear.

                          Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                          Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                          Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                          Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                          JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                          tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • JonathanLeeJ
                            JonathanLee
                            last edited by JonathanLee

                            Feature Request: Donate to Package Maintainer Button. This would make it clear right at the start and resolve a ton of issues. If money could be sent to them for issues or even for a thank you, they would be more appreciated. Who knows anyone else like this idea?

                            https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15056

                            Maybe it can be like Wikipedia.

                            Make sure to upvote

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jdeloach @michmoor
                              last edited by

                              This is getting a little bit ridiculous. Seems the few people on here are forgetting that Netgate is in business to make money.

                              Expecting them to support these packages for FREE is ridiculous. They have already stated that some of these packages are not compatiable with the latest versions of FreeBSD, so the package would have to be rewritten. They would have to hire more programmers but someone has to pay those folks salary. Programmers make thousands of dollars per year. Are the 8 to 10 folks on here wanting them to support all these packages willing to pay these programmers salary every year so Netgate can support them? I would venture to say the answer is NO.

                              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • tinfoilmattT
                                tinfoilmatt @michmoor
                                last edited by

                                @michmoor i disagree with everything you've said. if one has only the time and/or requisite skill to have everything just work, then buy a black box and all teh support to go with it.

                                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • M
                                  michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @tinfoilmatt
                                  last edited by michmoor

                                  @cyberconsultants
                                  Not asking for a turn-key solution from netgate. I know it isnt one. Just clarify in the documentation and marketing material.
                                  edit: But again thats not really the issue as well. If you say you support a feature similar to what a blackbox offers than thats the expectation. Clearly there is some misunderstanding here between what is offered and supported.

                                  Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                                  Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                  Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                  Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                                  JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                                  tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • A
                                    AlternateShadow @jdeloach
                                    last edited by

                                    @jdeloach said in How are packages supported:

                                    Expecting them to support these packages for FREE is ridiculous.

                                    Let's take a look at the store page where I can purchase something from them.

                                    features.jpg

                                    Fully 29% of their bullet points under features are unsupported by TAC after installation and they haven't even bothered to include a footnote pointing to the page on their site where they do provide that information.

                                    If they can't afford to support these features they should either stop advertising them or start charging more money so that they can.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • tinfoilmattT
                                      tinfoilmatt @michmoor
                                      last edited by

                                      @michmoor said in How are packages supported:

                                      Clearly there is some misunderstanding here between what is offered and supported.

                                      yes, definitely. all three of you here.

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        michmoor LAYER 8 Rebel Alliance @tinfoilmatt
                                        last edited by

                                        @cyberconsultants
                                        if you say so ma'am.

                                        Firewall: NetGate,Palo Alto-VM,Juniper SRX
                                        Routing: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                        Switching: Juniper, Arista, Cisco
                                        Wireless: Unifi, Aruba IAP
                                        JNCIP,CCNP Enterprise

                                        tinfoilmattT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • tinfoilmattT
                                          tinfoilmatt @michmoor
                                          last edited by tinfoilmatt

                                          @michmoor said in How are packages supported:

                                          if you say so ma'am.

                                          careful. your confusion is showing again.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • JonathanLeeJ
                                            JonathanLee
                                            last edited by

                                            https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/15056

                                            Redmine is open please respond if you feel the same way.

                                            Make sure to upvote

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.