Send Interface/VLAN traffic over Routed IP
- 
 Just checking before I order the line, have a local hotel with a pfSense firewall, looking at installing a new FTTP line, but need a separate external IP address for each room in the hotel. (So that any illegal activity can be traced back to a room/person) I can get a /28 subnet from the supplier. Just checking that I've understood routed IP's correctly, will I be able to direct traffic for each room (seperate VLAN interface) over different external IP's, or are routed IP's only good for routing back into a network? I.E. Machine A on IP A, Machine B on IP B etc etc? - P
 
- 
 @The-Computer-Guy 
 I assume, with "routed IP's" you mean, that the /28 is routed to your primary WAN IP by your ISP?If so, than yes, you can masquerade the outbound traffic of each internal IP with a different external IP out of the /28 subnet. If room IPs were sequential you could do this with a single NAT 1:1 rule. However, as you say, each is within a separate VLAN, you would have to add a separate outbound NAT rule for each room. 
- 
 @viragomann thanks, just checking "If so, than yes, you can masquerade the outbound traffic of each internal IP with a different external IP out of the /28 subnet." Only each individual IP, or each subnet? So I.E. VLAN 10 - Room 01 - IP Range 192.168.10.10 - 192.168.10.250 - Out VIA WAN IP 1 
 VLAN 11 - Room 02 - IP Range 192.168.11.10 - 192.168.11.250 - Out VIA WAN IP 2The whole range, per external IP? 
- 
 @The-Computer-Guy said in Send Interface/VLAN traffic over Routed IP: So I.E. VLAN 10 - Room 01 - IP Range 192.168.10.10 - 192.168.10.250 - Out VIA WAN IP 1 
 VLAN 11 - Room 02 - IP Range 192.168.11.10 - 192.168.11.250 - Out VIA WAN IP 2Yes, you can do this. In the outbound NAT rule just state the rooms subnet as source, e.g. 192.168.10.0/24. For the translation select "network or alias", enter the desired IP and a /32 (!) mask. 
 It would be okay to state the whole subnet, I think.Remember to switch the outbound NAT into hybrid mode. 
- 
 @viragomann - Great, thank you for the clarification :) 
