Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Weird CPU speed

    General pfSense Questions
    3
    26
    1.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Speedshift responds orders of magnitude faster than speedstep. When I was first testing it I had problems seeing what it's doing because simply running the command to report it bumps the CPU speed.

      However I would not expect that if it's set to maximum efficiency.

      O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O
        Octopuss @stephenw10
        last edited by

        @stephenw10 Hm, I have disabled Speed Shift, and now pfSense doesn't even display any frequency at all. That's not right I guess?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • stephenw10S
          stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
          last edited by

          Mmm, perhaps SpeedStep (EIST) is not enabled in the BIOS then.

          O 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • O
            Octopuss @stephenw10
            last edited by

            @stephenw10 Weirdly, the frequency info appeared after a few seconds. It also disappears after page refresh.
            Speedstep is enabled.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • O
              Octopuss @stephenw10
              last edited by

              @stephenw10 Btw does the Intel Core somerthing thermal sensor option apply to any Intel CPU? I'm not sure what to choose: this or the generic ACPI value? Both seem to work.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                The coretemp driver should work there.

                Yes, with speedstep it generally only shows frequency info when the CPU is running at a reduced frequency.

                Try running sysctl -a | grep freq again to see what levels are now shown.

                O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • O
                  Octopuss @stephenw10
                  last edited by

                  @stephenw10 said in Weird CPU speed:

                  sysctl -a | grep freq

                  Timecounter "HPET" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 950
                  Event timer "HPET" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 550
                  Event timer "HPET1" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET2" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET3" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET4" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0
                  Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
                  Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100
                  Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900
                  Timecounter "TSC" frequency 806401669 Hz quality 1000
                  Timecounter "HPET" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 950
                  Event timer "HPET" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 550
                  Event timer "HPET1" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET2" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET3" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET4" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0
                  Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
                  Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100
                  Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900
                  Timecounter "TSC" frequency 806402450 Hz quality 1000
                  Timecounter "HPET" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 950
                  Event timer "HPET" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 550
                  Event timer "HPET1" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET2" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET3" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET4" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0
                  Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
                  Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100
                  Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900
                  Timecounter "TSC" frequency 806401594 Hz quality 1000
                  Timecounter "HPET" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 950
                  Event timer "HPET" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 550
                  Event timer "HPET1" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET2" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET3" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "HPET4" frequency 19200000 Hz quality 440
                  Event timer "RTC" frequency 32768 Hz quality 0
                  Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
                  Event timer "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100
                  Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 900
                  Timecounter "TSC" frequency 806402560 Hz quality 1000
                  kern.timecounter.tc.TSC.frequency: 806402560
                  kern.timecounter.tc.ACPI-fast.frequency: 3579545
                  kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.frequency: 1193182
                  kern.timecounter.tc.HPET.frequency: 19200000
                  kern.ntp_pll.time_freq: 5467471872000
                  kern.ntp_pll.pps_freq: 5467471872000
                  device cpufreq
                  kern.eventtimer.et.i8254.frequency: 1193182
                  kern.eventtimer.et.RTC.frequency: 32768
                  kern.eventtimer.et.HPET4.frequency: 19200000
                  kern.eventtimer.et.HPET3.frequency: 19200000
                  kern.eventtimer.et.HPET2.frequency: 19200000
                  kern.eventtimer.et.HPET1.frequency: 19200000
                  kern.eventtimer.et.HPET.frequency: 19200000
                  kern.eventtimer.et.LAPIC.frequency: 806402560
                  kern.acct_chkfreq: 15
                  debug.cpufreq.verbose: 0
                  debug.cpufreq.lowest: 0
                  debug.uart_poll_freq: 50
                  machdep.tsc_freq: 806402560
                  machdep.i8254_freq: 1193182
                  machdep.acpi_timer_freq: 3579545
                  dev.cpufreq.3.freq_driver: est3
                  dev.cpufreq.3.%parent: cpu3
                  dev.cpufreq.3.%pnpinfo:
                  dev.cpufreq.3.%location:
                  dev.cpufreq.3.%driver: cpufreq
                  dev.cpufreq.3.%desc:
                  dev.cpufreq.2.freq_driver: est2
                  dev.cpufreq.2.%parent: cpu2
                  dev.cpufreq.2.%pnpinfo:
                  dev.cpufreq.2.%location:
                  dev.cpufreq.2.%driver: cpufreq
                  dev.cpufreq.2.%desc:
                  dev.cpufreq.1.freq_driver: est1
                  dev.cpufreq.1.%parent: cpu1
                  dev.cpufreq.1.%pnpinfo:
                  dev.cpufreq.1.%location:
                  dev.cpufreq.1.%driver: cpufreq
                  dev.cpufreq.1.%desc:
                  dev.cpufreq.0.freq_driver: est0
                  dev.cpufreq.0.%parent: cpu0
                  dev.cpufreq.0.%pnpinfo:
                  dev.cpufreq.0.%location:
                  dev.cpufreq.0.%driver: cpufreq
                  dev.cpufreq.0.%desc:
                  dev.cpufreq.%parent:
                  dev.est.3.freq_settings: 801/6000 800/6000 700/5160
                  dev.est.2.freq_settings: 801/6000 800/6000 700/5160
                  dev.est.1.freq_settings: 801/6000 800/6000 700/5160
                  dev.est.0.freq_settings: 801/6000 800/6000 700/5160
                  dev.cpu.3.freq_levels: 801/6000 800/6000 700/5160
                  dev.cpu.3.freq: 801
                  dev.cpu.2.freq_levels: 801/6000 800/6000 700/5160
                  dev.cpu.2.freq: 801
                  dev.cpu.1.freq_levels: 801/6000 800/6000 700/5160
                  dev.cpu.1.freq: 801
                  dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 801/6000 800/6000 700/5160

                  No idea what part of it is relevant.
                  PowerD is disabled if it matters.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    It must have been enabled at some point because the est(4) driver, speedstep, is loaded. The levels it's reporting, which are passed by the BIOS, are not useful though.

                    O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • O
                      Octopuss @stephenw10
                      last edited by

                      @stephenw10 Yes it was. I previously flipped several settings around.
                      What baffles me is the reported speed. And there's no way to tell whether it's real or not.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        Which one?

                        The speedstep levels there could be correct just not helpful. 700MHz and 800MHz are just that. 801MHz implies 800+turbo which could be anything, speedstep doesn't see the actual turbo speeds.

                        O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • O
                          Octopuss @stephenw10
                          last edited by

                          @stephenw10 The 1700-1900MHz one. That's with Speed Shift.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Speedshift does report the actual speed so I'd expect that to be real.

                            O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • O
                              Octopuss @stephenw10
                              last edited by

                              @stephenw10 Hmm, ok. But then something is not right anyway, because 1700MHz when there's less than 1% load.... that's just weird.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stephenw10S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by

                                That's unexpected if it set to maximum efficiency for sure. At higher performance levels it might be since as I said just opening the dashboard would ramp it up significantly.

                                O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • O
                                  Octopuss @stephenw10
                                  last edited by

                                  @stephenw10 I tried both extremes, and at max performance it went even higher, but never lower than 1700. But again, I don't know if it's the real speed, because the BIOS might be sketchy.

                                  T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stephenw10S
                                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                    last edited by

                                    Mmm, I guess I'd be reading through the epic length threads there are for those boxes on the serverthehome forums. Seems like people have done a lot of investigation there:
                                    https://forums.servethehome.com/index.php?threads/cwwk-topton-nxxx-quad-nic-router.39685/

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T
                                      TheNarc @Octopuss
                                      last edited by

                                      @Octopuss I believe that the machine that I have is identical, and I had similar problems. I was ultimately able to resolve them by loading a modded BIOS that exposed more settings than the one it came loaded with. I believe it was the PL1 setting that made the difference, but I'm not entirely sure. But I would direct you to this thread that I started:
                                      https://forum.netgate.com/topic/186104/topton-n100-reporting-402-mhz

                                      O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • O
                                        Octopuss @TheNarc
                                        last edited by Octopuss

                                        @TheNarc Thanks, I'll take a look.
                                        But modding a BIOS... I'm not sure about that. But do you think the BIOS isn't bugged then, technically speaking?

                                        T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • T
                                          TheNarc @Octopuss
                                          last edited by

                                          @Octopuss The way I look at, it's no more or less suspect than the BIOSes that come with these boxes. The way I think about it is that large companies (and even small companies) are not buying and using these boxes for business applications, so they do not present as an attractive target in that respect. So I feel that pretty much leaves "botnet nodes" as the most likely rationale for someone to compromise them. But there are far easier ways to amass botnet nodes than to make nefarious modifications to the BIOSes of niche devices used by some pfSense home users, then post them in a random forum thread and hope that a few dozen people use them. In my mind, the cost/benefit analysis just doesn't make sense for someone looking to attack/compromise vulnerable devices. But of course you have to come to your own decision.

                                          O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • O
                                            Octopuss @TheNarc
                                            last edited by

                                            @TheNarc I'm pretty confused what are you replying to :D What I was asking was whether you think it's a bug of the BIOS or just the result of certain CPU features not being exposed.

                                            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post