ULA address in addition to tracking interface

the other

@pixel24 hey there,
so you want to use SLAAC and in addition fixed IPv6?

In case your provider stops working (or pauses) your clients still have their link locale. Since you have just 1 LAN (no subnets) that should work as a fallback, since these are working in ONE network (but will not be routed > between networks). So ULA is nice but not really necessary.

You could use SLAAC only. This will grant you a host suffix by generating that part of the address from device's MAC. It can be used for ULA and GUA. It is not that nice, as those addresses are configured out of MAC, so something easy to remember as "fd::a" won't show, it would be something more complicated. Here: just use hostnames, set under your DNS resolver host overrides. I do not remember the ULA but the hostname (or fqdn).
Another approach would be to enter your host suffix in your dhcpv6. Here: https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/interfaces/configure-ipv6.html

But I might not get your point (which must be my fault since it's been a rough workday so far). :)

JKnott

@pixel24 said in ULA address in addition to tracking interface:

How can I setup this on the pfSense?

Using Unique Local Addresses

Bob.Dig

You need a patch for this to work fully. But this patch is buggy. You will not be able to turn on IPv6 via track on another interface with this patch applied.

pixel24

I have now configured the ULA address as described in the instructions:

I can reach a server in the LAN at its IPv6 ULA address via the diagnostics:

Do I understand the linked article (ULA bug) correctly that the problem is that it does not appear here? :

The network (ULA) is missing here. A patch is mentioned in the article on the ULA bug.

I have never applied a patch, can anyone tell me how it works?

JKnott

@pixel24

Why is part of this in English and part of some other language? It makes it hard to know what I'm looking at.

BTW, there's no need to hide part of the ULA address. Like RFC 1918 IPv4 addresses, they can't be reached from elsewhere.

the other

@JKnott
It's pfsense GUI with German language setting.
Might be a good idea for the original poster to switch to english and post those shots again to reach mor ppl here (*winkwink)

pixel24

@the-other said in ULA address in addition to tracking interface:

@JKnott
It's pfsense GUI with German language setting.
Might be a good idea for the original poster to switch to english and post those shots again to reach mor ppl here (*winkwink)

Sorry! I switch my UI to english

pixel24

I have

Services -> Router Advertisement

RA subnet(s): fdd0:a044:0f4c:0000:: /64

Firewall -> Virtual IP's -A Add

Type: IP alias
Interface: LAN
Address type: Single address
Address(es): fdd0:a044:f4c::fe
Description: ULA address LAN

configured. Do I understand the problem correctly that now under: DiagnosticsTables -> LAN_NETWORK

the IPv6 ULA network (fdd0:a044:0f4c:0000::) should appear?

JKnott

@pixel24 said in ULA address in addition to tracking interface:

the IPv6 ULA network (fdd0:a044:0f4c:0000::) should appear?

Where do you find that? I don't see anything like that.

I see you're running 2.7.2 and I have 2.7.0, but I wouldn't expect that to cause the difference.

pixel24

@pixel24 said in ULA address in addition to tracking interface:

the IPv6 ULA network (fdd0:a044:0f4c:0000::) should appear?

I asked this question because I was given the hint in the post above that I need a patch and also a link to a longer post here in the forum. In this post it was written that the ULA network is not under: DiagnosticsTables -> LAN_NETWORK.

I wanted to know if this should be the case. Maybe I didn't understand the problem in the linked post correctly :-(

the other

@pixel24 hey there,
nope: that patch mentioned was thought to fix a bug (vip IPs in rules stopped working after pfsense update > bug > patch > another problem occurred). Besides (!) that pfsense does not show ulas only gua and link locale (if I recall that right).

Now: you could add a new ula and it seems to be working (ping gets thru).
In tables (=tabellen) it shows your local IPv4 and your (?) gua...I assume you have rules including those two on that interface, so they show. No rule for ula yet? Won't show there then.

So: Dashboard won't show ula, tables will show in case you set a rule including it, status > interfaces only shows gua and local link but no ula...but it is working.

What did do? For example: go to diagnostics > command prompt and type "ipconfig" enter....tadaaaa....you should now see your interfaces and any assigned IP including ulas.
So you can see if and what address(es) interfaces use. I do not know of any other way under GUI to get pfsense to show its ula addresses.

BTW: IF you have a firewall rule including a GUA in LAN and your prefix changes (if your ISP is giving you dynamic ones) then your rule might become obsolet...that's one of the real messy things with IPv6, dynamic prefixes and pfsense IMHO...

pixel24

Thank you for the explanation! Then I don't need this patch :-)

With ifconfig on the console I see all addresses :-)

Yes, I still have the problem with the dynamic IPv6 prefix. To "work around" this, I tried to "route" the incoming IPv6 connections with the HA proxy to the appropriate ULA address based on the URL called:

https://forum.netgate.com/topic/186422/provider-prefix-delegation-prefix-changes-ha-proxy/3

which unfortunately does not work :-(