Abysmal Performance after pfSense hardware upgrade
-
It is. You just now have me curious what is causing the interrupts.
I'm considering getting the 1u version of my new router. If I do, I'll preform a clean install and look to rebuild my system one brick at a time to see if I can figure out what is causing the GUI slowdown I've had since I moved to my last hardware. I can try to keep an eye on the interrupts as well.
Here is the stats from Status -> Interfaces
I seem to be a little beyond the interrupt range you said shouldn't be "unusual".
https://forum.netgate.com/topic/179674/netgate-6100-significant-interface-interrupt-rates/9
-
Mmm, but no where near 10K! I agree though I find it odd that you see the interrupt loading in the top output and I do not on a similar C3K system. Like whilst passing 1Gbps iperf traffic on a 5100:
last pid: 57718; load averages: 0.55, 0.36, 0.34 up 0+06:27:17 22:57:28 339 threads: 7 running, 288 sleeping, 44 waiting CPU 0: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 28.6% system, 0.0% interrupt, 71.4% idle CPU 1: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 23.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 76.9% idle CPU 2: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 24.7% system, 0.0% interrupt, 74.9% idle CPU 3: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 34.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 65.9% idle Mem: 45M Active, 258M Inact, 505M Wired, 3028M Free ARC: 127M Total, 28M MFU, 93M MRU, 416K Anon, 962K Header, 4535K Other 92M Compressed, 229M Uncompressed, 2.48:1 Ratio Swap: 1024M Total, 1024M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 11 root 187 ki31 0B 64K RUN 0 377:22 73.68% [idle{idle: cpu0}] 11 root 187 ki31 0B 64K RUN 2 376:55 73.23% [idle{idle: cpu2}] 11 root 187 ki31 0B 64K RUN 1 377:47 72.55% [idle{idle: cpu1}] 11 root 187 ki31 0B 64K CPU3 3 376:45 72.51% [idle{idle: cpu3}] 0 root -60 - 0B 1648K - 0 0:06 19.51% [kernel{if_io_tqg_0}] 0 root -60 - 0B 1648K - 3 0:05 18.78% [kernel{if_io_tqg_3}] 0 root -60 - 0B 1648K CPU1 1 0:04 18.60% [kernel{if_io_tqg_1}] 57718 root 34 0 19M 8644K CPU0 0 0:03 17.05% iperf3 -c 172.21.16.8 -P 3 -t 30{iperf3} 57718 root 36 0 19M 8644K sbwait 3 0:04 16.93% iperf3 -c 172.21.16.8 -P 3 -t 30{iperf3} 57718 root 40 0 19M 8644K sbwait 1 0:03 16.74% iperf3 -c 172.21.16.8 -P 3 -t 30{iperf3} 0 root -60 - 0B 1648K - 1 0:36 0.14% [kernel{if_config_tqg_0}] 78943 root 20 0 14M 4716K CPU2 2 0:00 0.12% top -HaSP 7 root -16 - 0B 16K pftm 0 0:09 0.03% [pf purge] -
What settings did you utilize for the iperf test?
I turned on the server on my pfSense box
Then connected from my Windows box with
iperf3.exe -c 192.168.1.1 -P 2This way I get over 1Gbps
-
I ran the server on a Linux box on my network and then ran a client on pfSense:
[24.03-BETA][admin@5100-2.stevew.lan]/root: iperf3 -c 172.21.16.8 -P 3 -t 30 Connecting to host 172.21.16.8, port 5201 [ 5] local 172.21.16.75 port 22757 connected to 172.21.16.8 port 5201 [ 7] local 172.21.16.75 port 1280 connected to 172.21.16.8 port 5201 [ 9] local 172.21.16.75 port 22575 connected to 172.21.16.8 port 5201 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 39.2 MBytes 329 Mbits/sec 0 938 KBytes [ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 39.2 MBytes 329 Mbits/sec 0 939 KBytes [ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 39.2 MBytes 329 Mbits/sec 0 937 KBytes [SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 118 MBytes 986 Mbits/sec 0The 5100 ix NICs are 1G but the SoC is the same.
-
I averaged about 1.9Gbps with the interrupts @ 24%-31%
with your settings
I'm guessingthere are gremlins in the config, from being carried forward over a decade, multiple hardware, and os upgrades
-
Perhaps a long shot, but could it be that you have have some power saving settings for the CPU? Pegging it at a low frequency? I remember reading about that in relation to high interrupt under load.
-
Hmm, possible.
-
I didn't see anything explicitly listed for power savings that was enabled.
-
Ordering the Rackmount version shortly and I'll test restoring one component at a time to see if the interrupts persist, or at what point they may increase.
