Proper procedure for adding a NIC kernel module? (qlnxe)

stephenw10

What is that NIC exactly?

GeorgePatches

@stephenw10 Exactly? I'm not sure Qlogic FastLinQ 41000 series 2 port SFP. It's a QL41132HLCU, QL41212HLCU, or QL41262HLCU going by the Qlogic datasheet. I'm betting the QL41132HLCU as we wanted 10G cards and the other 2 models are 10G/25G cards. I'll need to dig in the firmware or the purchase orders to figure it out exactly. I will get back to you.

Sounds like this is a FreeBSD issue and nothing weird I did at least. Any idea why this wasn't detected on the initial install?

GeorgePatches

@stephenw10 said in Proper procedure for adding a NIC kernel module? (qlnxe):

What is that NIC exactly?

My speculation was correct, it is a Qlogic FastlinQ QL41132HLCU exactly.

kprovost

@stephenw10 I've not done any detailed digging, but there's been at least one bug fix in dump_iface() not too long ago to fix similar crashes:

commit 7d48224073ce14f0dd3db2d4e96876ac928b52f2
Author: Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org>
Date:   Sat Sep 30 15:11:57 2023 +0000

    netlink: fix accessing freed memory

    The check for if_addrlen in dump_iface() is not sufficient to determine
    if we still have a valid if_addr.  Rather than directly accessing if_addr
    check the STAILQ (for the first entry).
    This avoids panics when destroying cloned interfaces as experienced with
    net80211 wlan ones.

    Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
    MFC after:      3 days
    Reviewed by:    jhibbits (earlier version), kp
    Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D42027

It's certainly worth testing a 2.8 snapshot before we dig deeper.

GeorgePatches

@kprovost said in Proper procedure for adding a NIC kernel module? (qlnxe):

It's certainly worth testing a 2.8 snapshot before we dig deeper.

Would that fix be in the latest PF+? This is a production machine with lots of work happening, but I'm poking my management chain about paying for support.

kprovost

@GeorgePatches That particular patch is in 24.03, yes.

stephenw10

Hmm, I wonder if we can do something to avoid that bug as a test.

GeorgePatches

@stephenw10 Hmmmmm, a thought is that it blew up on the dummynet code. I can try ripping the limiters out and see it doesn't blow up.

GeorgePatches

This thought was wrong, it blew up exactly the same without limiters and the dummynet modules not loaded.

stephenw10

Well one thing ruled out I guess!

GeorgePatches

There's no easy way to like try a 2.8 snap and then roll back to 2.7.2, right? You can do that with PF+, if I understand the bootloader thing correctly?

I ask because management has approved our initial request for a support contract. We're currently waiting on a quote and then actual approval and purchasing. I'm ok putting a pin in this until it's easier to test a snap and roll back. This card is a nice to have, we're currently "doing fine" with our LAGG'd gigabit links.

stephenw10

You can manually create ZFS snapshots at the CLI in CE, assuming you are running ZFS. However there are no public 2.8-dev snapshots yet.