Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    Hardware reccomendations - small, reliable, in front fo low-traffic colo server

    Hardware
    6
    13
    6946
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      superwormy last edited by

      I'm looking for some hardware recommendations for something pfSense to put in front of 4 low-traffic colocated FreeBSD web servers.

      I don't have enough space for another 1U, but I could fit something smaller, think like the size of a 16 port switch or around there. Are there any decent pfSense appliances which match this description, or is there something I could build which would meet my needs?

      The 4 colocated boxes are low-traffic web servers sharing a block of 16 IP addresses, all on a 12mb cap.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kc8apf last edited by

        I've been really happy with the FW-7520 from Lanner (http://lannerinc.com/Network_Application_Platforms/x86_Network_Appliance/Desktop-Fanless_Appliances/FW-7520).  It's not particularly cheap, but it's small, fan-less, and has plenty of capacity.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • GruensFroeschli
          GruensFroeschli last edited by

          Your requirements sound like an ALIX:
          http://pcengines.ch/alix.htm

          We do what we must, because we can.

          Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cal_j last edited by

            http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262

            It's barebones, but for 239.00 not too bad.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              cmb last edited by

              An ALIX kit would be a good fit.
              http://www.netgate.com/index.php?cPath=60_84

              If you need redundant firewalls, the two ALIX in a 1U case is a very nice solution.
              http://www.netgate.com/product_info.php?products_id=774
              If you don't have the 1U of space, two ALIX kits would work just as well, just not as neat of a solution.

              A more powerful box.
              http://www.netgate.com/product_info.php?products_id=659
              but overkill if you have a 12 Mb cap.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kc8apf last edited by

                @cmb:

                A more powerful box.
                http://www.netgate.com/product_info.php?products_id=659
                but overkill if you have a 12 Mb cap.

                That looks like a rebranded Lanner FW-7522.  Probably cheaper direct from Lanner.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  cmb last edited by

                  @kc8apf:

                  That looks like a rebranded Lanner FW-7522.  Probably cheaper direct from Lanner.

                  It is. May be cheaper direct, maybe not, they buy in bulk so there may not be any difference. Should buy from Netgate either way, they're the biggest supporter of the project, it wouldn't be what it is today without their considerable backing. They also ship them pre-installed.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • valnar
                    valnar last edited by

                    Anybody know what the Lanner/Netgate box consumes in power?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kc8apf last edited by

                      @valnar:

                      Anybody know what the Lanner/Netgate box consumes in power?

                      If I remember correctly, my FW-7520 (same guts, smaller case) is about 20W.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • valnar
                        valnar last edited by

                        Wow, their entire lineup looks perfect for every pfSense scenario. 'Too expensive for a home use though.
                        http://www.lannerinc.com/Network_Application_Platforms/x86_Network_Appliance

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kc8apf last edited by

                          Actually, I use mine for my home network.  It works great between gigabit wired, 802.11n, VOIP, and 12/3Mb cable internet.  I pull lots of data over between wired and wireless, so it's been great to be able to do so at near line rates all the time.  Plus it fits in my wiring panel and is completely out of view (structured wiring panel with switch, router, voip box, cable modem, RF distribution amp, etc all between two studs in a hall closet).

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • valnar
                            valnar last edited by

                            kc8apf,
                            I could see buying one for a full install of pfSense.  I wonder if this model would support it since it can handle a laptop hard drive.
                            http://www.lannerinc.com/Network_Application_Platforms/x86_Network_Appliance/FW-7522

                            The issue is…how would one install it without video? I suppose I could install it on another PC first.  ???

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kc8apf last edited by

                              The FW-7520 is a bit misleading in the pictures on the website.  There is a space for mounting a 2.5" SATA drive internally and it comes with a dongle for VGA.  The FW-7522 just adds room for a 3.5" SATA drive.  I'm using the embedded image since I don't really need any packages for my usage.  For 1.2.3, the embedded image is based on nanobsd and supposedly allows for packages.  That would remove the need to use the VGA dongle.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post