RADIUS authentication failing (timed out) and dumping core

Konstanti

Hi.
Truss shows only the contents of system calls and nothing else.
As far as I can see, the socket opens in non-blocking mode

fcntl(9,F_SETFL,O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0 (0x0)

Therefore, the error for this mode is
35 EAGAIN Resource temporarily unavailable. This is a temporary condition and later calls to the same routine may complete normally.
it is quite real

The main question for me is why the client rejects the "good" first response from the server
For example ,
recvfrom(9,"^B\M-)\0\M-t\rv\M-]O~\M-$}\M-4~"...,4096,MSG_WAITALL,{ AF_INET
RADIUS:1812 },0x820d022fc) = 244 (0xf4)

RADIUS: 1812 - is this the real output of the truss utility ? or has the real ip address been replaced?

recvfrom(9,"^B\M-7\0\M-tL\M-6`\M^T\M^V\M^L"...,4096,MSG_WAITALL, { AF_INET 10.10.11.10:1812 } 0x820d022fc) = 244 (0xf4)

Are there any entries in the client's log?
Is there a way to intercept packet exchange using tcpdump?

if it is possible to run the dtrace utility, then you can see what happens during the connection

dtrace -n 'fbt::rad_send_request:return , fbt::rad_continue_send_request:return , fbt::rad_init_send_request:return , fbt::is_valid_response:return {printf("=>%d",arg1)}'

stephenw10

What pfSense version are you using here?

opoplawski

@stephenw10 pfSense 2.7.2-RELEASE (amd64)

opoplawski

@Konstanti RADIUS:1812 is a redaction of the IP address. dtrace looks like a bridge to far to get working on pfSense.

This is the only thing that ends up in the logs:

openvpn[94373]: /openvpn.auth-user.php: Error during RADIUS authentication : Operation timed out

stephenw10

Are you able to test this in Plus? Where dtrace is available.

opoplawski

@stephenw10 I get:

dtrace: invalid probe specifier fbt::rad_send_request:return , fbt::rad_continue_send_request:return , fbt::rad_init_send_request:return , fbt::is_valid_response:return {printf("=>%d",arg1)}: probe description fbt::rad_send_request:return does not match any probes

stephenw10

That's in 24.11? Looks like it's working but the query you're using in invalid. I won't pretend to be any sort of expert with dtrace though!

opoplawski

@stephenw10 24.03 - looks like I was stuck on previous stable for some reason. I'll try to update soon.

Seems to me like dtrace is for kernel stuff, not just C-library tracing, but I'm completely unfamiliar with dtrace.

stephenw10

Hmm, OK you're seeing the same error in radius from all three versions?

Konstanti

@opoplawski
DTrace is a comprehensive dynamic tracing framework ported from Solaris. DTrace provides a powerful infrastructure that permits administrators, developers, and service personnel to concisely answer arbitrary questions about the behavior of the operating system and user programs.

here is an example of working in user space, maybe you need to know the name of the process that calls the necessary functions

or

opoplawski

@Konstanti As I understand it, I would need probes for the php radius library in order to trace it. When I look at the output of dtrace -l to show the available probes I don't see anything relevant to what I want to trace. There are kernel functions, malloc stuff, syscalls (but I already have that with truss), etc.

It appears that php can be built with dtrace support, but it appears that it hasn't in pfSense Plus. But again what I really want to trace is php-pecl-radius

Konstanti

@opoplawski

Hi
You were right, I was wrong, dtrace does not work with all functions. Therefore, as a result, we see a probe error

P.S.
I think I've found a solution for the userland programs

we find the pid of the php-fpm process
ps -awx | grep php
342 - Ss 8:55.06 php-fpm: master process (/usr/local/lib/php-fpm.conf) (php-fpm)
23960 - I 3:31.30 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
27761 - I 2:07.14 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
31652 - I 3:16.94 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
37038 - I 3:12.25 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
46849 - I 0:55.34 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
55575 - I 3:18.29 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)
94877 - I 2:03.82 php-fpm: pool nginx (php-fpm)

2 using dtrace
dtrace -qn 'pid342:radius.so::entry { @[probefunc] = count();}'

dtrace -l | grep pid

70870 pid342 70871 pid342 radius.so 70872 pid342 radius.so 70873 pid342 radius.so 70874 pid342 radius.so 70875 pid342 radius.so 70876 pid342 radius.so 70877 pid342 radius.so 70878 pid342 radius.so 70879 pid342 radius.so 70880 pid342 radius.so 70881 pid342 radius.so 70882 pid342 radius.so 70883 pid342 radius.so 70884 pid342 radius.so 70885 pid342 radius.so 70886 pid342 radius.so 70887 pid342 radius.so 70888 pid342 radius.so 70889 pid342 radius.so 70890 pid342 radius.so 70891 pid342 radius.so 70892 pid342 radius.so 70893 pid342 radius.so 70894 pid342 radius.so 70895 pid342 radius.so 70896 pid342 radius.so 70897 pid342 radius.so 70898 pid342 radius.so 70899 pid342 radius.so 70900 pid342 radius.so 70901 pid342 radius.so 70902 pid342 radius.so 70903 pid342 radius.so 70904 pid342 radius.so 70905 pid342 radius.so 70906 pid342 radius.so 70907 pid342 radius.so 70908 pid342 radius.so 70909 pid342 radius.so 70910 pid342 radius.so 70911 pid342 radius.so 70912 pid342 radius.so 70913 pid342 radius.so 70914 pid342 radius.so 70915 pid342 radius.so 70916 pid342 radius.so 70917 pid342 radius.so 70918 pid342 radius.so 70919 pid342 radius.so 70920 pid342 radius.so 70921 pid342 radius.so 70922 pid342 radius.so 70923 pid342 radius.so 70924 pid342 radius.so 70925 pid342 radius.so 70926 pid342 radius.so 70927 pid342 radius.so 70928 pid342 radius.so 70929 pid342 radius.so 70930 pid342 radius.so 70931 pid342 radius.so radius.so zif_radius_put_vendor_addr entry
rad_close entry
rad_create_request entry
rad_put_vendor_int entry
rad_demangle entry
zif_radius_get_vendor_attr entry
rad_strerror entry
zif_radius_send_request entry
zif_radius_get_tagged_attr_tag entry
zif_radius_demangle entry
zif_radius_request_authenticator entry
zif_radius_put_int entry
rad_salt_value entry
zif_radius_salt_encrypt_attr entry
zif_radius_strerror entry
zif_radius_config entry
zif_radius_cvt_int entry
rad_acct_open entry
zif_radius_cvt_string entry
zif_radius_server_secret entry
zif_radius_get_tagged_attr_data entry
rad_put_vendor_attr entry
rad_send_request entry
rad_put_vendor_addr entry
zif_radius_add_server entry
zif_radius_close entry
rad_get_vendor_attr entry
rad_init_send_request entry
zif_radius_auth_open entry
_radius_close entry
rad_continue_send_request entry
get_module entry
rad_put_int entry
rad_put_attr entry
rad_auth_open entry
rad_get_attr entry
rad_cvt_int entry
zif_radius_acct_open entry
rad_cvt_addr entry
rad_put_addr entry
rad_server_secret entry
zif_radius_put_attr entry
zif_radius_get_attr entry
zif_radius_cvt_addr entry
zif_radius_put_addr entry
zm_startup_radius entry
rad_config entry
zm_info_radius entry
zif_radius_demangle_mppe_key entry
zif_radius_create_request entry
rad_open entry
zif_radius_put_vendor_int entry
zif_radius_put_string entry
rad_cvt_string entry
rad_demangle_mppe_key entry
rad_put_string entry
rad_request_authenticator entry
zif_radius_put_vendor_string entry
zif_radius_put_vendor_attr entry
zm_shutdown_radius entry
rad_put_vendor_string entry
rad_add_server entry

for example ,

dtrace -n 'pid342:radius.so:rad_send_request:return {printf("=>%d",arg1)}'
dtrace: description 'pid342:radius.so:rad_send_request:return ' matched 1 probe

opoplawski

@Konstanti well, that was an interesting if ultimately unfruitful direction, thanks. I created the following script to create a dtruss script:

#!/usr/local/bin/perl

open(PS,'ps -awx |');
while (<PS>) {
  next unless /php-fpm: pool/;
  ($pid) = split;
  push(@pids, $pid);
}
close(PS);

print "syscall::recvfrom:return\n";
print "/pid == " . join(" || pid == ", @pids) . "/\n";
print "{\n";
print 'printf("\n%d:\trecvfrom() = %d\n", pid, arg1);' . "\n";
print "}\n";

my $last_pid = pop(@pids);
foreach $pid (@pids) {
   print "pid" . $pid . ":radius.so::entry,\n";
}
print "pid" . $last_pid . ":radius.so::entry\n";
print "{\n";
print 'printf("%d:\t%s(%d, 0x%x, %4d)\t", pid, probefunc, arg0, arg1, arg2);' . "\n";
print "}\n";

foreach $pid (@pids) {
   print "pid" . $pid . ":radius.so:rad_strerror:return,\n";
}
print "pid" . $last_pid . ":radius.so:rad_streeor:return\n";
print "{\n";
print 'printf("(%d)\t = %s\n", pid, copyinstr(arg1));' . "\n";
print "}\n";

foreach $pid (@pids) {
   print "pid" . $pid . ":radius.so::return,\n";
}
print "pid" . $last_pid . ":radius.so::return\n";
print "{\n";
print 'printf("(%d)\t = %d\n", pid, arg1);' . "\n";
print "}\n";

It produces something like:

syscall::recvfrom:return
/pid == 14656 || pid == 30511 || pid == 31820 || pid == 53410 || pid == 74857 || pid == 99423 || pid == 99617/
{
printf("\n%d:\trecvfrom() = %d\n", pid, arg1);
}
pid14656:radius.so::entry,
pid30511:radius.so::entry,
pid31820:radius.so::entry,
pid53410:radius.so::entry,
pid74857:radius.so::entry,
pid99423:radius.so::entry,
pid99617:radius.so::entry
{
printf("%d:\t%s(%d, 0x%x, %4d)\t", pid, probefunc, arg0, arg1, arg2);
}
pid14656:radius.so:rad_strerror:return,
pid30511:radius.so:rad_strerror:return,
pid31820:radius.so:rad_strerror:return,
pid53410:radius.so:rad_strerror:return,
pid74857:radius.so:rad_strerror:return,
pid99423:radius.so:rad_strerror:return,
pid99617:radius.so:rad_streeror:return
{
printf("(%d)\t = %s\n", pid, copyinstr(arg1));
}
pid14656:radius.so::return,
pid30511:radius.so::return,
pid31820:radius.so::return,
pid53410:radius.so::return,
pid74857:radius.so::return,
pid99423:radius.so::return,
pid99617:radius.so::return
{
printf("(%d)\t = %d\n", pid, arg1);
}

And I got (cleaned up):

53410:  rad_send_request(45709006907392, 0x299275926a00,   80)
53410:  recvfrom() = 244
53410:  recvfrom() = -1
53410:  recvfrom() = 244
53410:  recvfrom() = -1
53410:  recvfrom() = 244
53410:  recvfrom() = -1
(53410)  = 4294967295
53410:  rad_strerror(45709006907392, 0x299275926a00,   80)   (53410)  = Operation timed out

Which is pretty much what I knew before. Still no idea why rad_send_request() does not accept the response that it gets.

On the up side, I do know a lot more know about dtrace.

Konstanti

@opoplawski
Hi
, what happens when the recvfrom function is executed has been known for a long time

the question is what happens when the client receives a response (244 bytes)
during the execution of this part of the program, the

rad_send_request
rad_continue_send_request
rad_init_send_request
is_valid_response

functions are used

the most interesting function, in my opinion, is
is_valid_response

but, apparently, it is impossible to get the result of its execution, this is an internal function that dtrace does not "see".

you can try to see what result the rest of the functions from this list return using dtrace

print 'printf("(%d)\t %s= %d\n", pid,probefunc,arg1);' . "\n";

I also recommend using tcpdump to analyze traffic on port 1812

suspect that the problem is precisely the result that the is_valid_response function returns
in case of an error, it returns 0 and forces the program to receive data from the socket (the second attempt to call the recvfrom function), as expected, the socket is empty and the function returns an error 35 EAGAIN

53410: recvfrom() = 244
recvfrom(9,"^B\M-)\0\M-t\rv\M-]O~\M-$}\M-4~"...,4096,MSG_WAITALL,{ AF_INET
RADIUS:1812 },0x820d022fc) = 244 (0xf4)

53410: recvfrom() = -1
recvfrom(9,0x37bbc7deab51,4096,MSG_WAITALL,0x820d02300,0x820d022fc) ERR#35
'Resource temporarily unavailable'

unfortunately, I do not find in the library code (radius.so) any implementation of zeroing the data reception buffer before calling the recvfrom function. Therefore, it is not known what is in the buffer after receiving the data,
is_valid_response

Check the source address
if ok, then
Check the message length
if ok , then
Check the response authenticator
if ok, the packet has been verified (return 1)
otherwise (return 0)

it is necessary to use tcpdump to analyze the radius server response

Gertjan

@Konstanti said in RADIUS authentication failing (timed out) and dumping core:

it is necessary to use tcpdump to analyze the radius server response

Don't forget
radtest
radsniff
radsniff

and
running radius manually

radiusd -X

(kill in first in the GUI then start it on the console or SSH )

opoplawski

@Gertjan So I used both tcpdump and radsniff to look at packet traces, but I can't see any issues. In both cases (working and non-working) the radius server sends back an Access-Accept message with the same set of fields.