Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS resolver failed to resolve some addresses

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    13 Posts 3 Posters 141 Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ Offline
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @martinez
      last edited by johnpoz

      @martinez if you can not talk to NSs via IPv4 your going to have lots and lots of issues.

      There are many many domains that only have IPv4 name servers.

      If you can ping those IPs via ipv4.. say for example that 199.19.57.1 answers ping for me. If you can ping that from a client on your network but unbound is having a hard time talking to it.. Does it work if you do a directed dig to it?

      $ dig @199.19.57.1 wikipedia.org ns                                                
                                                                                         
      ; <<>> DiG 9.16.50 <<>> @199.19.57.1 wikipedia.org ns                              
      ; (1 server found)                                                                 
      ;; global options: +cmd                                                            
      ;; Got answer:                                                                     
      ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27849                          
      ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 4                  
      ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available                                  
                                                                                         
      ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:                                                              
      ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232                                              
      ;; QUESTION SECTION:                                                               
      ;wikipedia.org.                 IN      NS                                         
                                                                                         
      ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:                                                              
      wikipedia.org.          3600    IN      NS      ns0.wikimedia.org.                 
      wikipedia.org.          3600    IN      NS      ns1.wikimedia.org.                 
      wikipedia.org.          3600    IN      NS      ns2.wikimedia.org.                 
                                                                                         
      ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:                                                             
      ns0.wikimedia.org.      3600    IN      A       208.80.154.238                     
      ns1.wikimedia.org.      3600    IN      A       208.80.153.231                     
      ns2.wikimedia.org.      3600    IN      A       198.35.27.27                       
                                                                                         
      ;; Query time: 194 msec                                                            
      ;; SERVER: 199.19.57.1#53(199.19.57.1)                                             
      ;; WHEN: Sat Oct 11 10:23:57 Central Daylight Time 2025                            
      ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 154                                                             
      

      Be it either a client behind pfsense doing the query, or pfsense itself doing the query

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8.1, 25.07.1

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        martinez @johnpoz
        last edited by

        @johnpoz No it's not working, with directed dig, got same message

        ;; communications error to 199.19.57.1#53: timed out
        ;; communications error to 199.19.57.1#53: timed out
        ;; communications error to 199.19.57.1#53: timed out
        

        I temporarily set up another unbound on local network and it's works fine (in case there is dns isp filtering on ipv4, but that doesn't seem to be the case.)


        On the resolver configuration page I only selected the WAN interface

        /var/unbound/unbound.conf

        # Outgoing interfaces to be used
        outgoing-interface: 10.153.43.214
        

        and to be sure of routing

        ping -S 10.153.43.214 199.19.57.1
        PING 199.19.57.1 (199.19.57.1) from 10.153.43.214: 56 data bytes
        64 bytes from 199.19.57.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=243.655 ms
        64 bytes from 199.19.57.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=243.858 ms
        

        ping from this address is ok, but dig always gives a timeout

        johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ Offline
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @martinez
          last edited by johnpoz

          @martinez I always set my unbound to use loopback as its outgoing.. If you can not talk to ipv4 with unbound bound to your interface?

          So your pfsense behind a nat.,. its wan IP is 10.153? Or you bound it to the lan interface for some strange reason??

          unbound.jpg

          I bind to the localhost, because it should just use your normal routing that way. But try binding it to all.

          If bound to localhost, when system starts or if you have issues with your wan for example unbound can start and bind to the interface even if wan is not yet up, etc.

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8.1, 25.07.1

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • M Offline
            martinez @johnpoz
            last edited by

            @johnpoz It's good to know for the loopback (I will find out more).

            Yes, (unfortunately) I am behind a NAT from the access provider and the address 10.153 bound to my WAN interface.

            I set the binding to All and rebooted, then localhost, with both configurations the problem remained unchanged

            johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ Offline
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @martinez
              last edited by

              @martinez well what I would do is sniff on your wan interface while you doing a IPv4 query, say your trace.. If you see the query go out, and nothing back then problem is upstream of pfsense.. If you never see the query leave your wan with correct IP then problem is related to something on your side.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8.1, 25.07.1

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                martinez @johnpoz
                last edited by

                @johnpoz I just ran the test, and... I only get outgoing DNS traffic in IPv6 (with the ipv6 in alias below)

                So I'm wondering if the problem somewhere :

                Capture d'écran 2025-10-12 043458.png

                Capture d'écran 2025-10-12 043507.png

                Since I didn't receive IPv6 with DHCP, I used "virtual IP" to assign a public address on the WAN interface. However, I have outgoing DNS traffic with IPv6 defined as an alias, but no outgoing traffic with 10.153.

                However, if I use a resolver internal to the LAN, I do get SNAT and outgoing traffic (and the correct responses).

                I feel like I'm not doing this correctly ?

                johnpozJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ Offline
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @martinez
                  last edited by johnpoz

                  @martinez turn off your ipv6....

                  You need to turn off your IPv6 to validate ipv4 is working - if you can not talk to ipv4 dns, much of the internet is not going to work for you.

                  When you do a dns query to ipv4 address from behind pfsense it works.. But from pfsense it does not? Is it not sending anything at all? Is it sending it with wrong address?

                  Show a sniff on your wan with IPv6 off and from a client doing an dns query to some IPv4.. Then do the same query from pfsense cmd line. Unbound should be able to query to IPv4 addresses, if clients can talk to IPv4 out on the internet. If not then you have something major messed up.. Did you turn off IPv4 in unbound or something? With an option?

                  Do you have anything setup in the unbound (resolver) options box?

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 25.07.1 | Lab VMs 2.8.1, 25.07.1

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    martinez @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz

                    That's exactly it: clients can communicate with IPv4 and make requests to external DNS servers, while unbound can't.

                    I followed your procedure, with IPv6 disabled, and when I run a request from pfsense (with the DNS resolver pointing to unbound 127.0.0.1), I get nothing at all.

                    In the unbound configuration, I have no special, no "custom" options.

                    This is interesting:

                    1. If I check "forward" in the resolver and specify a resolver that belongs to the LAN, the DNS resolution works.
                    2. If I change the address to a resolver located on the Internet (i.e., outgoing through the WAN interface), it doesn't work.

                    I launched a traceroute from the firewall (in case it behaves differently than with forwarded packets) on one of the external DNS that I tested and no route problems

                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S Offline
                      SteveITS Rebel Alliance @martinez
                      last edited by

                      @martinez since you are forwarding, did you disable DNSSEC?

                      Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                      When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to reboot, or more depending on packages, and device or disk speed.
                      Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        martinez @SteveITS
                        last edited by

                        @SteveITS

                        Yes, I just checked it's disabled. I must have disabled it since the troubleshooting began. I haven't touched it since.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.