• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Change log, version 2 and low level filtering

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
3 Posts 2 Posters 1.3k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ?
    Guest
    last edited by Dec 17, 2009, 6:10 AM

    Hey, I just thought about three question I still have about pfsense…

    Is there a clear and complete changelog available for each version? And an history since the start?

    Also, I start hearing about version 2, is there a list of changes that will be made to version 2?

    And for my last question, is there an option in the firewall to set rules as low as ethernet ethertypes?? if not, is it possible down to IP packet types numbers?

    Thanks

    Alex

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • G
      GruensFroeschli
      last edited by Dec 17, 2009, 6:56 AM

      http://blog.pfsense.org
      http://redmine.pfsense.org
      https://rcs.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense
      For older versions you probably need to look at http://cvs.pfsense.org

      Afaik it's not possible to filter with your own ethertypes (or at least the gui doesnt support it).
      But you can filter with different IP protocols. In the gui supported are: TCP, UDP, ICMP, ESP, AH, GRE, IGMP, CARP, pfSync

      For what would you need this?

      We do what we must, because we can.

      Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        GruensFroeschli
        last edited by Dec 17, 2009, 10:44 PM

        If you dont have a rule to allow it: yes it will be blocked.

        There is another entry in the drop-down: "any"
        If you dont have a rule allowing any, then the protocols not specifically allowed, will be blocked.

        We do what we must, because we can.

        Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        3 out of 3
        • First post
          3/3
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
          This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
          consent.not_received