Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Traffic shaping without the wizard?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Shaping
    11 Posts 7 Posters 5.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      hoba
      last edited by

      Actually trafficshaping is quite hard to setup and to understand. This even becomes harder when making multi-interface-shapings. Atm we only support what the wizard creates and shaping between 2 interfaces. There are some limitations in the gui when creating custom rules (like you can't attach a queue to another queue that is attached to the parent queue) though in general setting a multi interface scenario up might be possible if done correctly. You really have to play around with it. I suggest starting with a wizard created ruleset and modifying this first. Then try to add more queues and rules but be prepared to get rule-errors if you set it up incorrectly.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S Offline
        steff
        last edited by

        @hoba:

        Actually trafficshaping is quite hard to setup and to understand.

        So I've noticed ;-)

        Given that this sounds a bit "unofficial" I'll have a play on the production firewall's twin and report back.

        Cheers,

        Steff

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T Offline
          TealC
          last edited by

          Hi

          I have a similiar situation as "Steff". Currently i'm using m0n0wall with 3 interfaces and the pptp Server. On WAN interface i do shape traffic, but the config is pretty simple, as i have just a few protocols which i actually configure specially, the rest is per host. On the Wireless Interface i only distinguish between pptp and the rest.
          Now i'm considering to get a second WAN connection as failover because my primary one isn't very reliable. But m0n0wall doesn't support multiple WAN connections. This brings me to pfsense. But if i can't achieve my traffic shaper scenario, pfsense is no option for me.
          Is it not possible to deactivate the wizard?
          (I know it has to be possible, but why don't you tell people how? You don't need to provide support for "self-made" configurations)

          Greetings
          TealC

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H Offline
            hoba
            last edited by

            altq trafficshaping is not that easy like dummynet. If you make a single mistake it won't load at all. Actually you can make custom rules but you need to run the wizard once to setup some basics. After that if you visit the trafficshaper you will have rules and queues. You can modify them, add or delete them but now you are on unsupported territory. You'll see what I mean once you try to create your custom ruleset. Good luck.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              Justinw
              last edited by

              @TealC:

              Hi

              I have a similiar situation as "Steff". Currently i'm using m0n0wall with 3 interfaces and the pptp Server. On WAN interface i do shape traffic, but the config is pretty simple, as i have just a few protocols which i actually configure specially, the rest is per host. On the Wireless Interface i only distinguish between pptp and the rest.
              Now i'm considering to get a second WAN connection as failover because my primary one isn't very reliable. But m0n0wall doesn't support multiple WAN connections. This brings me to pfsense. But if i can't achieve my traffic shaper scenario, pfsense is no option for me.
              Is it not possible to deactivate the wizard?
              (I know it has to be possible, but why don't you tell people how? You don't need to provide support for "self-made" configurations)

              Greetings
              TealC

              Mult-wan traffic shaping is possible although unsupported, being done right now with two 5 meg dsl's

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                sullrich
                last edited by

                @Justinw:

                Mult-wan traffic shaping is possible although unsupported, we are doing it right now with two 5 meg dsl's

                As Borat would say, NNICE!

                Do you mind sharing this config?  You can export it under Diagnostics -> Backup

                Select the traffic shaping option and only download that portion of the configuration.

                Then simply search and replace any external IP addresses that you may have and change descriptions if they are sensitive ;)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  sindum
                  last edited by

                  Justinw. I would really like see who you did this. I tried a lot of combination but have failed to get it working. Pleas !!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J Offline
                    Justinw
                    last edited by

                    Sorry, finals week, I'll post the conf when I have a chance to get ahold of it…

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J Offline
                      Justinw
                      last edited by

                      Well I'm out…bad news is that traffic shaper is running but the traffic isn't being classified as correctly but its not crashing.  I'm going to keep working with it and I will post when I get it.  Don't I feel like a jerk...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J Offline
                        jeroen234
                        last edited by

                        do not crosspost that is not helping !!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.