Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Hardware 'Upgrade'

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    4 Posts 2 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      BenKenobe
      last edited by

      Decided to 'upgrade' my current PFSense hardware (an old Dell GX260 with 1 Gig Ram) because I can't upgrade the RAM any further and Snort is really not happy and keeps shutting down due to lack of swap space (depsite me configuring the system with a 10 Gig swap drive).

      So I plan to install now into an old Abit AW8 MAX motherboard with 2 Gig of DDR2 800 RAM but can not decide which of my spare CPU's to use.

      A Pentium D 945 @ 3.4 GHz

      Or a Core 2 Duo E5400 @ 2.7 GHz.

      I have no doubt that both CPU's will handle PFSense easily, but which CPU would be the lesser of the overkills (Given that the Pentium D runs hot and isn't particularly economical) but the E5400 is an ideal CPU for newer projects such as home theatre and I think a serious overkill for PFSense use.

      Need some ideas which to use.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        clarknova
        last edited by

        You will see a large difference in power usage between these two. Consider the fact that PFS will run 24/7, and use the C2D. The less efficient P(4)D, paired with a relatively modern (and modest) GPU will function adequately as an HTPC, and less time running means less energy wasted.

        db

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          BenKenobe
          last edited by

          Thanks, that kind of supports my thoughts, I retired the P4 because of it's heat and power usage so I guess using it in a 24/7 system would be a bit silly.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            clarknova
            last edited by

            On topic, my brother just retired a PD 3.0GHz. It was using 130W at the wall, idle. The replacement X2 240 system measures ~45W idle at the wall. Both using integrated ATI graphics. The newer C2D I would expect to use no more than that in a similar configuration, so yeah, quite a difference.

            db

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.