Transparent firewall
-
This error report is of no use. Next time write down the errors.
-
Ok, I downloaded and burned a new ISO 96.2 from today on one of the mirrors. Installed. Configured.
Then, I created my bridge, deactivated NAT reflections … AND THERE IT WAS !
I rebooted to check something in the BIOS (didn't change anything though) ... and on reboot, configuration was there ... but no more bridge working. I don't have time to double check today so i'll do it tomorrow but that's quite annoying :/
-
OK, i'm build new bridge configuration
One moment - Lan mask (must be 32) take many my time.
My bridge dont work along i not memory this mask settings.Second moment - if i set any dummy address in Lan (not WAN address) - filter reload progress give error in [].. - what this i don't understand. But only i setup In LAN address IP= WAN address or mask=32 - all filter reload update normally
Please set in GUI avtomatic update LAN IP = WAN IP but only mask=32. This must leave many errors.
May be disable IP setting edit field LAN ip for BRIDGE mode?
And other any Bridged internal interfaces (OPT and etc)? -
on wan set a real ip adress this is the interface you will conect to
on lan set a ipadress it don't make out wat
it wil be ignord when you bridge it with youre wanmake sure youre on beta4 with the updates
-
list of interfaces for bridging
wan - lan wan ipadress
lan - opt1 lan ipadress
opt1 - opt2 opt1 ipadress
wan - opt1 wanipadress
opt1 - wan - lan wanipadress
etclist of interface weight
wan-lan-opt1-opt2 etc
interface with most weight is the ipadress that will work after the bridged melting -
Beta 4 updated, Bridge mode ON
If i set Lan any other address - i can ping them ( 2 address of firewall present!)
And - periodical error update rules + shaper problemNow i Begining test what i setup new (with prevous my post)
7 filtersupdate processes pass without errors (i dont change eny rule - only Edit-Save-Apply)
And shaper perhaps work too - this needs more testing. -
The shaper won't work in a bridging configuration.
-
This conceptual? Or in future shaping bridge possoble?
ps. I wanted use bridge(Or equivalence) + shapping + proxy in one system :(
-
It's a limitation. Not sure if there is a way to work around it. However, it won't be included in 1.0 and there is no promise that it will be in 1.1.
-
OK
If this can be in future - i very glad.
Thks.