Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Dhcp issues

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DHCP and DNS
    12 Posts 3 Posters 4.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      particleman
      last edited by

      Hi i set up pfsense and all seems to be working one issue i do see that im attempting to correct is my fire wall logs show a private ip address being blocked multiple times per second Apr 16 08:00:45  WAN  10.19.160.1:67  255.255.255.255:68  UDP
      Apr 16 08:00:58 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:01:01 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:01:13 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:01:15 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:01:15 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:01:19 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:02:06 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:02:06 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:02:49 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP
      Apr 16 08:03:11 WAN 10.19.160.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 UDP

      i also see

      Apr 15 23:46:58 dhclient[26566]: DHCPDISCOVER on dc0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 1
      Apr 15 23:46:58 dhclient[26566]: DHCPOFFER from 10.19.160.1

      so im thinking this is some type of error on my part any suggestions? thanks for looking.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        EddieA
        last edited by

        That is normal DHCP traffic, where the DHCP server, is responding to requests to other users, on the same subnet.

        Cheers.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          particleman
          last edited by

          I'm just confused who the users making that request are  since its just me a server and another wirelsess device behind the firewall.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            danswartz
            last edited by

            What is your WAN IP and config type (e.g. PPPoE, DHCP, etc…)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              particleman
              last edited by

              My wan ip is 173.16.xxx.xx and i am using dhcp and i am sorry I also am totally green to pfsense.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E
                EddieA
                last edited by

                They are coming from the same DHCP server, that gives you your address.  Your Cable/DSL/Dial-Up provider.

                As I said, normal traffic.  If you want to filter them out of the log, then you need to set up your own firewall rule, with No-Log, so they don't drop through to the default block rule.

                Cheers.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  danswartz
                  last edited by

                  Why are they in a totally different (RFC1918) subnet?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    particleman
                    last edited by

                    For now i have just disable logging the default rule so at least i can see what is going on in my logs

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      EddieA
                      last edited by

                      @danswartz:

                      Why are they in a totally different (RFC1918) subnet?

                      I can't explain it, but so are mine.  Here's the contents of /tmp/re0_error_output:

                      re0: no link .... got link
                      DHCPDISCOVER on re0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 2
                      DHCPDISCOVER on re0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 2
                      DHCPDISCOVER on re0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4
                      DHCPOFFER from 10.252.48.1
                      DHCPREQUEST on re0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
                      DHCPACK from 10.252.48.1
                      bound to 98.148.xxx.xxx -- renewal in 43199 seconds.
                      
                      

                      You can see that the DHCPOFFER and DHCPACK come from an 10. subnet, but the assigned IP is a valid, registered, 98. subnet.

                      nslookup gives:  cpe-98-148-xxx-xxx.socal.res.rr.com

                      Cheers.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        particleman
                        last edited by

                        Also in the default installation it asked if I wanted to block private networks I chose yes (why would a private network even be on the Internet) now I'm wondering if I choose to NOT block private networks if that would be a simple way to end my issues totally. What are the implications of this choice will it severely compromise my security?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          EddieA
                          last edited by

                          @particleman:

                          why would a private network even be on the Internet

                          It's not.  It's only between you, and all the other users on the same "section" of your ISP's private network, using the same DHCP server.

                          @particleman:

                          now I'm wondering if I choose to NOT block private networks if that would be a simple way to end my issues totally.

                          That's one way.  Another it to duplicate that particular rule, but precede it with one that specifically looks for the DHCP replies, and drops them, without logging.

                          Cheers.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P
                            particleman
                            last edited by

                            I want to thank you guys for all the help. So far so good running perfect.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.