Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    ACK queue

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    7 Posts 3 Posters 3.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      diosney
      last edited by

      Hi!

      I don't want an ACK queue for my traffic shaping configuration, instead I want that Penalty IP acks goes to the Penalty IP queue, for example.

      How I can accomplish this?

      I'm running a pfSense 2.0 Box.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        danswartz
        last edited by

        Why don't you want ACK shaping?  That is a good thing.  If you want penalizing of bad IPs, does the wizard not set that right for you?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D Offline
          diosney
          last edited by

          I mean that I want ACK shaping, but not in a different and completely separated queue. I want that the ACKs from John go to the John's queue and the Smidth's ACKs go to the Smidth queue.

          It's possible? If it is, how I accomplish that?

          Thanks in advance.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            danswartz
            last edited by

            I'm not sure that can readily be done from the GUI.  Given how small ACks generally are, I'm also not sure it will really accomplish anything.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E Offline
              eri--
              last edited by

              Just do not setup the ack queue on the rules?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D Offline
                danswartz
                last edited by

                Oh, yeah, maybe.  I read it as meaning that he wanted the ACK prioritization, but per user.  Re-reading it though, that's an assumption on my part that is unwarranted.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D Offline
                  diosney
                  last edited by

                  @ermal:

                  I think that maybe the way is as you say, but I had my doubts. I tried putting in the ACK/Queue rule the same queue for both rules, but the configuration complained with a "ACK queue must not be the same that the queue configured" error.

                  So, when I want that the ACKs goes to a queue that it's already shaped, simply I don't put an ACK queue specification in the rule.

                  @danswartz:

                  That is exactly what I want.

                  Thanks both of you, guys.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.