Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New Traffic Shaper - What works correctly or makes sense?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    21 Posts 6 Posters 11.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      Liath.WW
      last edited by

      As someone that is somewhat knowledgeable, but by no means a networking expert, I can agree with SNA about the wizard.

      I know a bit about networking and how to set up queues and such, enough to do really well in 1.2.3.  But the wizard in 2.0 is plain confusing, and over-complex.  While many people that use pfSense are extremely well-versed in networking and such, there are also many that are not.  When I first downloaded pfSense, I was really new, and read an article on how to put an old machine of mine to use ("Armor Your Palace" article).  Since then I've come a long way and learned quite a bit.

      The difference between the wizards is extreme enough that when seeing the one for 2.0, I just looked at it for a few minutes.  Also there should not be more than one wizard.  It should be one wizard that is able to deal with the different combinations.  I would think (I'm not a coder so I'm guessing) that one wizard with SNA's idea would reduce coding (1 wizard instead of many), and IMHO would be much more intuitive and functional.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.