• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Quick question on snort's default rules directory

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
4 Posts 3 Posters 5.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P
    pfnoober
    last edited by Jul 22, 2010, 10:44 PM

    pfsense 1.2.3 release
    snort 2.8.6, pkg 1.27

    When I go into the rule updates tab it displays a warning that /usr/local/etc/snort/rules directory is empty.  I did verify this by going into the shell and indeed there's nothing there.

    The thing is I already have a subdirectory created for my interface and the rules are stored there at:  /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_29189_fxp0/rules

    I've edited the /usr/local/etc/snort/snort.conf file, down around line 60, to:  var RULE PATH ../snort_29189_fxp0/rules but I can't see any difference.  If I press the update rules button it doesn't download anything and I'd prefer to get rid of that warning.  Should I just move all the rules to the default ../rules directory instead of my interface subdirectory?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • J
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by Jul 26, 2010, 12:50 PM

      Keep an eye on this thread for updates:

      http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,26382.45.html

      I'll try to fix this since it seems the usual maintainer hasn't been around in a while.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pfnoober
        last edited by Jul 26, 2010, 6:35 PM

        Thanks, I actually have been keeping an eye on the main thread you linked to.

        I realize my question may seem pretty stupid to others here, but I guess the main thing I was trying to ask was there any benefit to storing my rules in the interface's subdirectory rather than the general rules directory?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          DigitalJer
          last edited by Jul 27, 2010, 1:15 AM

          jimp has a proposed fix at the thread he links to above…

          –------------------------------------------------
          2.4.3-RELEASE (amd64)
          built on Mon Mar 26 18:02:04 CDT 2018
          FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p7
          VM in ESXi 5.5
          1 x 1000baseTX (WAN)
          1 x 1000baseTX (LAN)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          4 out of 4
          • First post
            4/4
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
            consent.not_received