Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPSEC VPN via Public ip addressing/NAT overlap? anyone Beuler?

    IPsec
    2
    2
    2.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      beaven67
      last edited by

      I have a somewhat difficult task. I have setup several pfsense VPN's with no big issues.
      What i need is quite different with a new vpn setup. I need policy-based nat or static nat type of VPN.
      The servers are rfc 1918 space IE 172.16.1.10-20 and PUBLIC IP 149.149.140.10-20 (STATIC NATS)
      I need a VPN setup to access a remote subnet so that the remote subnet only uses the public ip addresses.
      I have done this on several occasions with other firewall vendors. I typically use this with banks, and financial based businesses.
      I have some Ideas but want to know if anyone has done this with PFsense yet. If you have can you give me some details as to how you did it?
      Thanks,
      Pat  ;D

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        Unfortunately, FreeBSD (and thus pfSense) can't combine NAT and IPsec (yet?).

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post
        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.