Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    How to setup "True Loadbalancing" via Multiple WANs?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    5 Posts 3 Posters 2.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      dklev
      last edited by

      Hi,

      I am not sure if my idea is discussed already, I want to do the following setup (as described in this Sticky topic http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,16923.0.html under True Loadbalancing):

      In a datacenter, where I get fixed ip ranges, I would like to have a pfSense (newest beta).

      In our office I would like to have pfSense, to. Now I want to setup one or more tunnels via different ISPs to the data center's pfSense.

      The result should be, that I can route a complete fixed IP range into our office, but via several WANs (DSL, Cable, UMTS).

      The routing itself shouldn't be the problem. The goal here should be, how to "combine" my different WANs to one big line into the datacentre. In case that all WAN lines are up, my download/upload speed should be the total sum of all capacities (except some protocol overhead of courde). In case one WAN line dies, the tunnel must continue with the rest without bigger interruption, as long as the line(s) come up again automatically.

      Can you give me some start tipps or some links, where someone did this before?
      Hugo

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        There isn't any support for that in the GUI, even on 2.0. At least not yet.

        A month or so ago we were kicking around ideas about how to pull this off and it may be possible using something like lagg/lacp/mlppp/etc over private VPN links to combine bandwidth but nothing concrete was settled on.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D
          dklev
          last edited by

          Hi Jimp,

          I think the private networks over different WANs should be not to difficult. May be only the "dynamic bonding" part has to be solved. Do you have any plans to investigate here?

          Hugo

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            dklev
            last edited by

            (push)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              Do not reply to your own topic just to get it put back at the top.  If someone can help you, they will.  Jimp's answer is about as definitive as its going to get for now.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.