Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Parallel port missing in 1.2.3-release

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    27 Posts 6 Posters 8.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • W
      wallabybob
      last edited by

      I just upgraded the firmware in my pfSense 2.0 system to the 1-Jan-2011 snapshot build. On reboot I entered the BIOS and (as I expected) the parallel port was disabled. I changed the parallel port setting from Disabled to 378/IRQ7 (first option, others were 278/IRQ5 and 3BC/IRQ7). On reboot I saw in the startup output:

      
      . . .
      ppc0: <parallel port="">port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0
      ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode
      ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold
      ppc0: [ITHREAD]
      ppbus0: <parallel port="" bus="">on ppc0
      plip0: <plip network="" interface="">on ppbus0
      plip0: [ITHREAD]
      lpt0: <printer>on ppbus0
      lpt0: [ITHREAD]
      lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
      ppi0: <parallel i="" o="">on ppbus0
       . . .
      
      # ls -l /dev/lpt0
      crw-------  1 root  wheel    0,  49 Jan  3 21:45 /dev/lpt0
      #</parallel></printer></plip></parallel></parallel> 
      

      Perhaps you have a "standard" parallel port but at a non-standard address. Can you find out its address, IRQ and (possibly) DMA channel? Perhaps the BIOS will report that; perhaps the BIOS will allow changing it to use standard port address and IRQ (378/IRQ7)

      You don't seem to be using ACPI. Is there a reason for that? I expect ACPI would tell FreeBSD the parallel port I/O resources. (ACPI is enabled in my system.)

      If you can't use ACPI there are alternate ways of specifying the parallel port i/o resources but it might be best to get the parallel port at the standard address, reboot and see if the startup reports a ppc0.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        wallabybob
        last edited by

        On my pfSense 2.0 box FreeBSD detects the parallel port regardless of which of the three addresses it is assigned and regardless of whether ACPI is enabled or disabled. The parallel port controller is named ppc0 if the port address is 0x378 or 0x3bc and is named ppc1 if the port address is 0x278.

        So what are the port addresses of these parallel ports which aren't detected? Maybe that information can be found in the BIOS. In my system the menu path is Integrated Peripherals -> Onboard SuperIO and from there I can change the parallel port settings.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          wolfiedk
          last edited by

          Hello again.

          I have now tryed with the LiveCD pfsense2.0beta snapshot 03-jan-2010 and it detects the parallel port just fine. The error must bee in the 1.2.3-release kernel (or something like that, but i´m only guessing)

          Is is possible to integrate the missing "driveres" into the 1.2.3-release?
          I cant switch to the 2.0 because i´m using the multi-wan setup.

          Best regards
          WolfieDK

          IMAG0111.jpg
          IMAG0111.jpg_thumb

          Best regards
          WolfieDK

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W
            wallabybob
            last edited by

            @wolfiedk:

            Is is possible to integrate the missing "driveres" into the 1.2.3-release?

            See Cry Havok's reply of 1st Jan.

            Perhaps someone else could comment on whether multiWAN works in recent pfSense 2.0 BETA snapshots.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • W
              wolfiedk
              last edited by

              Hi wallabybob:

              See Cry Havok's reply of 1st Jan.
              

              Yearh, i´m still searching the net for a step-by-step guide :-P

              Best regards
              WolfieDK

              Best regards
              WolfieDK

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                @wallabybob:

                Perhaps someone else could comment on whether multiWAN works in recent pfSense 2.0 BETA snapshots.

                Works great. Has for months.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stephenw10S
                  stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                  last edited by

                  @jimp:

                  Works great. Has for months.

                  Problem solved!  ;D

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.