Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    High CPU-usage with a Intel Core i3?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    17 Posts 5 Posters 13.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      ericab
      last edited by

      UNCHECK  |–-> System ---> Advanced ---> Networking ---> Enable device polling

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        Looks like you have polling on, as ericab was hinting at. Polling uses all spare CPU cycles to check for input from the network instead of waiting for interrupts.

        On an i3 I doubt you need polling, it probably wouldn't help you much at all.

        If it's not polling, we'd need to see a screen or so of output from "top -SH" from the shell to see what processes are using the CPU.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          KrPacMan
          last edited by

          Device polling wasnt enabled. Strange. I checked it and unchecked it just to be safe, but the CPU-usage is still very high.

          This is the output from the top -sh:

          _24434 root        1  8  20  6564K  4844K wait    9:01  0.00% sh
            442 root        1 -58    0 21076K 18936K bpf      2:31  0.00% tcpdump
            420 root        1  44    0  3268K  1152K select  2:01  0.00% syslogd
            443 root        1  -8    0  3156K  784K piperd  1:05  0.00% logger
            988 root        1  8  20  3156K  796K nanslp  1:04  0.00% check_reload_status
            613 root        1  4    0  6168K  3128K kqread  0:30  0.00% lighttpd
          24256 root        1  44    0  3312K  1540K select  0:10  0.00% hostapd
          55879 nobody      1  64  20  3156K  1336K select  0:05  0.00% dnsmasq
            965 root        1  8    0  3240K  1272K nanslp  0:04  0.00% cron
            875 _ntp        1  44    0  3156K  1228K select  0:04  0.00% ntpd
          55906 dhcpd      1  64  20  3156K  2036K select  0:02  0.00% dhcpd
            890 root        1  44    0  3156K  1244K select  0:01  0.00% ntpd
            997 root        1  8    0  3156K  900K nanslp  0:01  0.00% minicron
          45213 root        1  -8    0 40712K 17136K piperd  0:01  0.00% php
            635 root        1  4    0 44808K 20296K accept  0:01  0.00% php
          22507 dhcp      1  44    0  3156K  1320K select  0:01  0.00% dhclient
            625 root        1  4    0 45832K 20104K accept  0:01  0.00% php
            618 root        1  4    0 45832K 18992K accept  0:00  0.00% php

          Panda GateDefender Performa 8100 (Portwell NR-5500) with Pfsense 2.1 :: blog

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            top -SH
            

            (capital s, capital h)

            Also be sure to include the header lines that list the summary of cpu/ram/etc usage.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              KrPacMan
              last edited by

              Ops, sorry. Here's the full output:

              _$ top -SH
              last pid: 59280;  load averages:  0.22,  0.11,  0.04  up 42+20:33:39    19:09:33
              84 processes:  2 running, 63 sleeping, 19 waiting

              Mem: 70M Active, 26M Inact, 38M Wired, 92K Cache, 31M Buf, 1729M Free
              Swap: 4096M Total, 4096M Free

              PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE    RES STATE    TIME  WCPU COMMAND
                34 root    -68    -    0K    8K WAIT  823.4H 96.00% irq19: sf1 atapci1
                11 root    171 ki31    0K    8K RUN    189.3H 10.79% idle: cpu0
                25 root    -68    -    0K    8K WAIT  380:59  0.00% irq18: sf0 atapci0
                26 root    -68    -    0K    8K WAIT  202:23  0.00% irq16: sf3 ehci0
                15 root      44    -    0K    8K -      125:28  0.00% yarrow
                12 root    -32    -    0K    8K WAIT    52:33  0.00% swi4: clock sio
                33 root    -68    -    0K    8K WAIT    17:49  0.00% irq22: ral0
              24434 root      8  20  6564K  4844K wait    9:03  0.00% sh
                442 root    -58    0 21076K 18960K bpf      2:31  0.00% tcpdump
                420 root      44    0  3268K  1148K select  2:01  0.00% syslogd
                  4 root      -8    -    0K    8K -        1:57  0.00% g_up
                20 root      8    -    0K    8K -        1:39  0.00% thread taskq
                  5 root      -8    -    0K    8K -        1:16  0.00% g_down
                443 root      -8    0  3156K  784K piperd  1:05  0.00% logger
                988 root      8  20  3156K  796K nanslp  1:04  0.00% check_reload_status
                48 root      20    -    0K    8K syncer  0:46  0.00% syncer
                613 root      4    0  6168K  3128K kqread  0:30  0.00% lighttpd
                  3 root      -8    -    0K    8K -        0:25  0.00% g_event_

              Seems to be problems with an IRQ, maybe from the Ralink or SiS-nics?

              Panda GateDefender Performa 8100 (Portwell NR-5500) with Pfsense 2.1 :: blog

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                grep atapci1 /var/log/dmesg.boot

                It's probably an HDD controller, so something is making the HDD chew up lots of CPU.

                You might try adjusting any IDE/SATA options you have in the BIOS.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  KrPacMan
                  last edited by

                  Very strange. SF1 is one of the server NIC:s with four ports.

                  Sorry to take your time, but i'm terrible with FreeBSD :-/ The grep command gave me this:

                  atapci1: <intel ata="" controller="">port 0xf090-0xf097,0xf080-0xf083,0xf070-0xf077,0xf060-0xf063,0xf050-0xf05f,0xf040-0xf04f irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0
                  atapci1: [ITHREAD]
                  ata4: <ata 0="" channel="">on atapci1
                  ata5: <ata 1="" channel="">on atapci1</ata></ata></intel>

                  Could it be the HDD that has bad sectors etc?

                  Panda GateDefender Performa 8100 (Portwell NR-5500) with Pfsense 2.1 :: blog

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    Is the drive actually on that controller? Is anything?

                    atacontrol list
                    

                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      KrPacMan
                      last edited by

                      ATA channel 0:
                          Master:      no device present
                          Slave:      no device present
                      ATA channel 1:
                          Master:      no device present
                          Slave:      no device present
                      ATA channel 2:
                          Master:      no device present
                          Slave:      no device present
                      ATA channel 3:
                          Master:      no device present
                          Slave:      no device present
                      ATA channel 4:
                          Master:  ad8 <st980811as 3.alb="">SATA revision 1.x
                          Slave:      no device present
                      ATA channel 5:
                          Master: acd0 <optiarc dvd="" rw="" ad-5240s="" 1.03="">SATA revision 1.x
                          Slave:      no device present</optiarc></st980811as>

                      Panda GateDefender Performa 8100 (Portwell NR-5500) with Pfsense 2.1 :: blog

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        So it could be either the HDD or the DVD

                        You could try moving the DVD drive to another controller, see if the problem stays the same or follows the DVD drive.

                        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          KrPacMan
                          last edited by

                          Thanks! I'll try to change SATA-port and unplug the DVD. Very strange problem since the controller is the standard ICH11 from Intel.

                          Panda GateDefender Performa 8100 (Portwell NR-5500) with Pfsense 2.1 :: blog

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • W
                            wallabybob
                            last edited by

                            This line

                            34 root    -68    -    0K    8K WAIT  823.4H 96.00% irq19: sf1 atapci1

                            shows its the irq19 handler thats chewing up most of the CPU. It shows that AT LEAST devices sf1 and atapci1 use irq19. There may be others.

                            One possible explanation is that the BIOS has either incorrectly calculated the IRQs or has provided incorrect information to FreeBSD such that FreeBSD thinks that some device which really uses IRQ19 uses (say IRQ17). If this is happening then the handler for such device would be on IRQ17 and when the device interrupts on IRQ19 there is no handler there to clear the interrupt condition and so on exit from the interrupt there is an immediate interrupt again because the interrupt condition hasn't been cleared.

                            Another possible explanation is that there is a bug in the handler for some device on IRQ19 and in some circumstances the interrupt condition is not cleared.

                            Perhaps this problem will go away if you try a pfSense 2.0 snapshot build; it has newer device drivers than pfSense 1.2.3 and your motherboard has a pretty new chipset.

                            If you can't go to pfSense 2.0 or it doesn't help you could try removing devices to see what makes a difference. Can you put one or more of your disks on atapci1? Can you replace (at least for test) the 4 port NIC?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jimpJ
                              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                              last edited by

                              vmstat -i
                              

                              Will show what devices are on an IRQ (to a point..)

                              I didn't catch the sf1 in there earlier, but that is an Adaptec ethernet controller… I don't think I've ever seen one of those before, not sure what kind of quality it is (or the driver for that matter) so as wallabybob mentioned it could be that as well.

                              Moving the devices around a bit may still prove helpful, at least in narrowing down exactly which is to blame.

                              It might be worth relocating both of those drives to the primary sata controller instead of ports 4/5, they are obviously connected through a different internal path. sf1 may behave itself if it doesn't have to fight for the bus.

                              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                              Do not Chat/PM for help!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • X
                                xenonsky
                                last edited by

                                I seems to have the exact same problem on my new 1.2.3 install on i3 540 and thru the Web GUI it showed a constant 20+% CPU.
                                When view thru "top -SH" command I get the following which showed "irq19: atapci1+" taking up 89% on CPU0

                                top -SH

                                last pid: 29754;  load averages:  0.00,  0.01,  0.00                                up 0+05:13:43  06:09:48
                                87 processes:  6 running, 66 sleeping, 15 waiting
                                CPU:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.1% system, 23.0% interrupt, 76.8% idle
                                Mem: 23M Active, 9280K Inact, 37M Wired, 280K Cache, 16M Buf, 2864M Free
                                Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free

                                PID USERNAME PRI NICE  SIZE    RES STATE  C  TIME  WCPU COMMAND
                                  11 root    171 ki31    0K    8K CPU3  3 311:54 100.00% idle: cpu3
                                  13 root    171 ki31    0K    8K CPU1  1 311:45 100.00% idle: cpu1
                                  12 root    171 ki31    0K    8K RUN    2 308:51 100.00% idle: cpu2
                                  38 root    -64    -    0K    8K CPU0  0 264:54 89.79% irq19: atapci1+
                                  14 root    171 ki31    0K    8K RUN    0  47:24 11.87% idle: cpu0

                                The "atacontrol list" command output I got:

                                atacontrol list

                                ATA channel 0:
                                    Master:      no device present
                                    Slave:      no device present
                                ATA channel 1:
                                    Master:      no device present
                                    Slave:      no device present
                                ATA channel 2:
                                    Master:      no device present
                                    Slave:      no device present
                                ATA channel 3:
                                    Master:  ad6 <st3500514ns sn11="">SATA revision 2.x
                                    Slave:      no device present
                                ATA channel 4:
                                    Master: acd0 <hl-dt-st dvdram="" gh24ns50="" xp02="">SATA revision 1.x
                                    Slave:      no device present
                                ATA channel 5:
                                    Master:      no device present
                                    Slave:      no device present
                                ATA channel 6:
                                    Master:      no device present
                                    Slave:      no device present

                                and "vmstat -i" output I got:

                                vmstat -i

                                interrupt                          total      rate
                                irq16: ehci0                        159          0
                                irq19: atapci1+              1281400417      67541
                                irq23: ehci1                          55          0
                                cpu0: timer                    37942915      1999
                                irq256: re0                      364280        19
                                irq257: re1                      353607        18
                                cpu2: timer                    37933878      1999
                                cpu3: timer                    37933877      1999
                                cpu1: timer                    37933878      1999
                                Total                        1433863066      75577

                                So I'm wondering should I also try to relocate my SATA Hard disk to ATA channel 1 and DVD rom to ATA channel 2?

                                Any suggestion ?

                                Thanks.</hl-dt-st></st3500514ns>

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • W
                                  wallabybob
                                  last edited by

                                  Please post the dmesg output so we can see more about your configuration, particularly what devices are using irq19.

                                  If you have the option to do so, i would go into the BIOS, record the mode of all the disk controllers and change them all to legacy rather than raid or AHCI and see if that makes a difference. Or try a snapshot build of pfSense 2.0.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • X
                                    xenonsky
                                    last edited by

                                    This is very interesting after I poke around i can actually see that the CPU hog for IRQ19 is used by "Intel ATA Controller" as i can see it during the system bootup and it scroll by the screen.
                                    then I check my system BIOS and my on-board SATA controller is already using IDE mode (non AHCI mode). So i went and disable just about everything I can find under the BIOS related to AHCI or disk mode and access, but nothing will make the CPU hog of IRQ19 drop. So finally I decided to change my SATA controller from IDE mode to AHCI mode, then after a reboot, my CPU usage is down to about 0% now. So this is interesting that it should be set to AHCI mode on this hardware combination.

                                    This has been a good learning experience.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.