Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPv6 testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPv6
    357 Posts 48 Posters 293.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      databeestje
      last edited by

      gateway support is not complete yet, the filter rules are not address family aware yet.

      If you try to set a v4 gateway on a v6 rule that will result in a rules error.

      If no gateway is defined it will try to lookup a gateway for "wan" which doesn't have a v6 gateway and is returning this result in logfile.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pfsense_fan009
        last edited by

        Could you also make an rc3 4G nanobsd ipv6 release?

        Pfsense 2.x on Alix 2d13 (dual wan with failover).

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          pfsense_fan009
          last edited by

          @pfsense_fan009:

          Could you also make an rc3 4G nanobsd ipv6 release?

          any plans for the future ?

          Pfsense 2.x on Alix 2d13 (dual wan with failover).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            Cino
            last edited by

            I gitsync this morning and after reboot, my packages dont auto-start. I get this error:

            Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in /etc/inc/pkg-utils.inc on line 550

            currently running 2.0-RC3-IPv6 (i386) built on Fri Jul 8 19:24:31 EDT 2011. Do i need to update my snapshot?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              cmb
              last edited by

              @Cino:

              I gitsync this morning and after reboot, my packages dont auto-start. I get this error:

              Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in /etc/inc/pkg-utils.inc on line 550

              currently running 2.0-RC3-IPv6 (i386) built on Fri Jul 8 19:24:31 EDT 2011. Do i need to update my snapshot?

              This is fixed.
              https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense/commit/0b07c7636f583ad39d9ea31ea7fc322554607496

              if you're gitsyncing from master (which now has the IPv6 code merged and is now 2.1) and not Seth's branch, you'll have that if you gitsync again. Or can just manually fix that one line

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                singerie
                last edited by

                what should we put in the repository url ?

                currently it's git://github.com/smos/pfsense-ipv6.git

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Cino
                  last edited by

                  That is good news to hear!!

                  I went ahead and deleted the /root/pfsense folder so it would point me back to the main code, git://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense.git
                  . then gitsync

                  After the system reboot I noticed 2 new errors:

                  Warning: Unexpected character in input: "" (ASCII=92) state=1 in /etc/inc/pkg-utils.inc on line 556

                  Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '"' in etec/inc/pkg-utils.inc on line 556

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    tebeve
                    last edited by

                    @singerie:

                    what should we put in the repository url ?

                    currently it's git://github.com/smos/pfsense-ipv6.git

                    oops, sorry, didn't see this when I posted HERE asking the same thing.

                    looks like the answer is yes tho, it should be:
                    git://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense.git
                    now

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • I
                      iFloris
                      last edited by

                      @Cino:

                      After the system reboot I noticed 2 new errors:

                      Warning: Unexpected character in input: "" (ASCII=92) state=1 in /etc/inc/pkg-utils.inc on line 556

                      Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '"' in etec/inc/pkg-utils.inc on line 556

                      That's due to a missing " in line 556, you can fix that by adding a " before the \n" so that it looks like this:```
                      pkg_debug(gettext("ERROR! Unable to fetch package configuration file. Aborting installation.") . "\n");

                      one layer of information
                      removed

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        Cino
                        last edited by

                        @iFloris:

                        @Cino:

                        After the system reboot I noticed 2 new errors:

                        Warning: Unexpected character in input: "" (ASCII=92) state=1 in /etc/inc/pkg-utils.inc on line 556

                        Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '"' in etec/inc/pkg-utils.inc on line 556

                        That's due to a missing " in line 556, you can fix that by adding a " before the \n" so that it looks like this:```
                        pkg_debug(gettext("ERROR! Unable to fetch package configuration file. Aborting installation.") . "\n");

                        Thanks iFloris! I didn't have a chance to look at the file before I posted but wanted to let the devs now so it can be fix in the code.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                          last edited by

                          Ok just to be clear, maybe the last commit fixed error on line 550?  But 556 is still broke.

                          I just changed over the new branch, and change git sync url, etc.

                          Did an update too
                          2.1-DEVELOPMENT (i386)
                          built on Thu Jul 14 01:23:35 EDT 2011

                          Even ran a manual gitsync, and still was getting error had to manually go in and add the " on this line
                          pkg_debug(gettext("ERROR! Unable to fetch package configuration file. Aborting installation.") . "\n");

                          in /etc/inc/pkg-utils.inc

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • C
                            cmb
                            last edited by

                            @johnpoz:

                            Ok just to be clear, maybe the last commit fixed error on line 550?  But 556 is still broke.

                            I just changed over the new branch, and change git sync url, etc.

                            Did an update too
                            2.1-DEVELOPMENT (i386)
                            built on Thu Jul 14 01:23:35 EDT 2011

                            Even ran a manual gitsync, and still was getting error had to manually go in and add the " on this line
                            pkg_debug(gettext("ERROR! Unable to fetch package configuration file. Aborting installation.") . "\n");

                            in /etc/inc/pkg-utils.inc

                            Jim fixed that one today.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              Cino
                              last edited by

                              My HE tunnel wont up after a gitsync/reboot today.

                              Looking at the changes, I believe this change: https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense/commit/87f0f42c3230ad7ad15b14a8a9d63c58f8b2e379 is the cause. When i hand-type the code back in that was removed and reboot; my interface comes up.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • johnpozJ
                                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                last edited by

                                I just did a gitsync, and got the latest commits - the one your talking about, and rebooted and my HE tunnel came up no problems.

                                Now it was odd before the reboot after the gitsync I was seeing a crash error on the UI that would not seem to go away.  Odd, it had no details in it, close it, send it and it would just pop back up.

                                But everything seems to be working currently

                                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  Cino
                                  last edited by

                                  @johnpoz:

                                  I just did a gitsync, and got the latest commits - the one your talking about, and rebooted and my HE tunnel came up no problems.

                                  Now it was odd before the reboot after the gitsync I was seeing a crash error on the UI that would not seem to go away.  Odd, it had no details in it, close it, send it and it would just pop back up.

                                  But everything seems to be working currently

                                  Is your subnet mask 64bits or 128bits for your tunnel? Mines 64-bit

                                  I was able to get it to work after clicking save/apply under the interface configuration page. IPv6 code has had a similar issue a couple of months ago to where we had to manually add a route or click save/apply..

                                  see post http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,32721.msg179781/topicseen.html#msg179781

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    JoelC707
                                    last edited by

                                    I'm having to do the same save/apply business. To make matters worse my DSL was in and out all day yesterday and it was leaving the tunnel down every time the DSL came back up. Talk about annoying having to go in and do that every few minutes lol. I finally gave up on it and surfed from bed with my phone lol. Grrrr, seems to be doing it again. In any case my tunnel is a /64. IIRC the direction say to do /128 or /120 but my tunnel wouldn't come up with that config. Since HE's site  says /64 for the tunnel I figured it should be /64 on my end as well (same logic as different subnets on a LAN, they won't always talk to each other).

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                      last edited by

                                      Mine is /128 There was some issues with that a while back.  You can bring it up /64 and then just change it to /128

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C
                                        Cino
                                        last edited by

                                        When I first setup the tunnel we had to use 128 but it has resolve so we can use the 64 subnet that HE assigned to us for the tunnel. After my update yesterday, my tunnel wont come up with a 64 subnet but will come up with 128 subnet… I'm wondering if the code that was removed was a workaround to get the tunnel to come up using 64bit subnet... idk tho...

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          JoelC707
                                          last edited by

                                          Currently running the 05:55:15 snapshot from 7/15 and whenever my DSL hiccups the v6 WAN still won't come back up by itself, it stays in "gathering data" according to the gateways widget. Obviously I'd love to get the DSL fixed and this probably wouldn't be a problem but alas it's not my house. It affects my grandfather just as much as it does me so you think he would be annoyed by it too. Two days ago when this started he said he would call Bellsouth and see if they can fix it but I have no idea if he did or if anyone ever came out to look at it (normally does this when we get a heavy rain so me things something is attenuating on the line somewhere which granted may not be an easy fix).

                                          Anyway, both my WANv6 and GIF configs are still using a /64. They are the same v6 address space though (7, LAN is 8) so if I change it to a /128 should I change the gif tunnel settings or the WANv6 settings or both? Any chance this will even fix the problem? Note that we do have a static V4 IP from Bellsouth so the IP isn't changing causing this issue.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • D
                                            databeestje
                                            last edited by

                                            I am using 128 for the gif interface config and 126 on the interfaces page. That comes up reliably after failure for me and reboots.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.