Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Sharing a LAN But Not a WAN: The Story of Two Homes Linked By WiMAX

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    3 Posts 2 Posters 1.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      AkkerKid
      last edited by

      I'm putting a wireless bridge between my house and a friend's house.  We want to share files (Samba, DC++, FTP) between our LANs but not over a VPN through the internet.  Each house will have it's own internet connection, it's own 3+ port pfSense box, and a Ubiquiti Nanobridge M5 wireless bridge.  We would also like to use each other's internet as a failover for our own.  Is it possible?  What kind of fancy routing should I try?
      wimax.png
      wimax.png_thumb

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Offline
        AkkerKid
        last edited by

        So far I've installed version 2.0 and gave my router 10.0.0.1/16 on it's lan side.  Local DHCP serves a range from 10.0.0.100 to 10.0.0.250 within an overall subnet of 255.255.0.0.

        Location 0                        Location 1              Location n
        LAN: 10.0.0.xxx                  10.0.1.xxx              10.0.n.xxx
        GW: 10.0.0.1                    10.0.1.1                  10.0.n.1

        Option 1:
        I could just bridge my lans and the wireless, filtering all but Samba/DC/FTP ports and doing the same on the other side.

        Option 2:
        Keep LANs separate and make routes within each router to carry traffic destined for the other subnet through the wireless.  It'd work but if I started adding more homes to my "alternet", I'll have to update every router with the new routes and that would get old kinda fast.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S Offline
          spiritbreaker
          last edited by

          Hi,

          hmm  bridging is not a good option here because services would affect each other eg. dhcp gateway. I think that dont work very well.

          I would prefer option 2

          because:

          -devided networks
          -prevent broadcast traffic over wireless network
          -failover possible and more easy (the failover gateway is the wlan interface ip adress of the opposite pfsense)

          cya

          Pfsense running at 11 Locations
          -mobile OPENVPN and IPSEC
          -multiwan failover
          -filtering proxy(squidguard) in bridgemode with ntop monitoring

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.