Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Upgraded from 1.2.3 to RC1 via the update and I could not ping out

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    6 Posts 3 Posters 2.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T Offline
      tommyboy180
      last edited by

      DNS was working correctly from the LAN side and pfsense itself had internet connectivity however none of my clients on the LAN could not ping or browse any sites.

      I ran a capture on the LAN interface and could see those ping attempts and site attempts but nothing was coming back in.

      Has anyone had this issue with the RC1?

      -Tom Schaefer
      SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

      Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        tommyboy180
        last edited by

        Linked are some images to help with troubleshooting.

        Imgur album: http://imgur.com/a/d6MiV


        http://i.imgur.com/fJeMt.jpg - States
        http://i.imgur.com/3GfAC.jpg - Packet capture
        http://i.imgur.com/sO81W.jpg - Interface overview
        http://i.imgur.com/n2ij8.jpg - ifconfig

        -Tom Schaefer
        SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

        Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T Offline
          tommyboy180
          last edited by

          I went back to factory defaults and setup my interfaces…Same problem.

          -Tom Schaefer
          SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

          Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • W Offline
            wallabybob
            last edited by

            Your pfSense has a default route (# netstat -r -n)?

            Can your LAN clients ping the pfSense upstream box (72.191.32.1?)

            On a LAN client what do you see on a traceroute to somewhere on the Internet?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T Offline
              tommyboy180
              last edited by

              Well this is strange. I went back to 1.2.3 and then back up to 2.0 RC1 and now everything works. Here is the output requested.

              # netstat -r -n
              Routing tables
              
              Internet:
              Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
              default            72.191.32.1        UGS         0     5177    em1
              72.191.32.0/20     link#2             U           0      101    em1
              72.191.39.125      link#2             UHS         0        0    lo0
              127.0.0.1          link#4             UH          0      108    lo0
              172.16.1.0/28      link#3             U           0      375   fxp0
              172.16.1.1         link#3             UHS         0        0    lo0
              192.168.1.0/24     link#1             U           0     5193    em0
              192.168.1.1        link#1             UHS         0        0    lo0
              209.18.47.61       00:30:48:b0:e9:03  UHS         0        0    em1
              209.18.47.62       00:30:48:b0:e9:03  UHS         0        0    em1
              
              Internet6:
              Destination                       Gateway                       Flags      Netif Expire
              ::1                               ::1                           UH          lo0
              fe80::%em0/64                     link#1                        U           em0
              fe80::230:48ff:feb0:e902%em0      link#1                        UHS         lo0
              fe80::%em1/64                     link#2                        U           em1
              fe80::230:48ff:feb0:e903%em1      link#2                        UHS         lo0
              fe80::%fxp0/64                    link#3                        U          fxp0
              fe80::202:b3ff:fea0:6107%fxp0     link#3                        UHS         lo0
              fe80::%lo0/64                     link#4                        U           lo0
              fe80::1%lo0                       link#4                        UHS         lo0
              ff01:1::/32                       fe80::230:48ff:feb0:e902%em0  U           em0
              ff01:2::/32                       fe80::230:48ff:feb0:e903%em1  U           em1
              ff01:3::/32                       fe80::202:b3ff:fea0:6107%fxp0 U          fxp0
              ff01:4::/32                       ::1                           U           lo0
              ff02::%em0/32                     fe80::230:48ff:feb0:e902%em0  U           em0
              ff02::%em1/32                     fe80::230:48ff:feb0:e903%em1  U           em1
              ff02::%fxp0/32                    fe80::202:b3ff:fea0:6107%fxp0 U          fxp0
              ff02::%lo0/32                     ::1                           U           lo0
              #
              
              C:\Users\tom>ping 72.191.39.125
              
              Pinging 72.191.39.125 with 32 bytes of data:
              Reply from 72.191.39.125: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
              Reply from 72.191.39.125: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
              Reply from 72.191.39.125: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
              Reply from 72.191.39.125: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
              
              Ping statistics for 72.191.39.125:
                  Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
              Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
                  Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
              
              C:\Users\tom>ping 72.191.32.1
              
              Pinging 72.191.32.1 with 32 bytes of data:
              Reply from 72.191.32.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=254
              Reply from 72.191.32.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=254
              Reply from 72.191.32.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=254
              Reply from 72.191.32.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=254
              
              Ping statistics for 72.191.32.1:
                  Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
              Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
                  Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 9ms, Average = 8ms
              
              C:\Users\tom>
              

              Every time I upgraded I have had to restart the webserver. This is the first time that the upgrade worked. I'm tempted to try it again to see if I can find out why it wasn't working.

              Any ideas?

              -Tom Schaefer
              SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

              Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ Offline
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                Sounds like your outbound NAT isn't right.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.