Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    4-port NIC recommends, PCI-e X4 or X8

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    5 Posts 3 Posters 4.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L
      lifespeed
      last edited by

      I would like to put together a router than can handle Gigabit LAN-LAN, and  100+ Mbps WAN-LAN.  I'll do a single VPN connection, and use traffic shaping.  My internet right now is only 20/2 Mbps, but 50/10 is available.  Plus room for expansion is wise as my neighborhood is likely to see further speed increases.

      I am trying to spec a 4-port LAN card.  The Intel E1G44HTBLK, which is 8250 based, looks to be quite the performer including a direct PCIe 2.0 interface in the chipset, not relying on a PCIe bridge chip.  And it is priced appropriately at $340.

      Are there more-reasonably-priced alternatives to get me 4 ports and still retain the ability to handle wire-speed traffic within my LAN?  I have a RAID server on this network, and can saturate Gb ethernet pretty easily.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jasonlitka
        last edited by

        1. I don't believe that NIC will actually work unless you build a driver yourself.
        2. The PT cards should work out of the box.
        3. Unless you have a reason to push LAN-LAN traffic through pfSense, you're better off just using a switch.

        I can break anything.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          mhab12
          last edited by

          I was under the impression that the newer Intel cards (E1G44HTBLK) were supported in 2.0 as it was based on FreeBSD 8?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            lifespeed
            last edited by

            @jasonlitka:

            3. Unless you have a reason to push LAN-LAN traffic through pfSense, you're better off just using a switch.

            I would likely apply QoS based on DSCP tags to LAN-LAN as well as WAN-LAN traffic for a mixed voice/data network.  Can you be more specific about why I would not want LAN traffic going through pfsense?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jasonlitka
              last edited by

              @mhab12:

              I was under the impression that the newer Intel cards (E1G44HTBLK) were supported in 2.0 as it was based on FreeBSD 8?

              The 8.0 (and 8.1/8.2) HCL says 82576 is the newest supported.  That might not be accurate though.

              @lifespeed:

              @jasonlitka:

              3. Unless you have a reason to push LAN-LAN traffic through pfSense, you're better off just using a switch.

              I would likely apply QoS based on DSCP tags to LAN-LAN as well as WAN-LAN traffic for a mixed voice/data network.  Can you be more specific about why I would not want LAN traffic going through pfsense?

              Because any traffic that is LAN-LAN will seriously drag down your system.  It takes a LOT of power to push 1000Mbit/s through a box.  You're better off using vLANs and an L3 switch to keep your local voice & data traffic separate.  Keep the pfSense box out of the way so it only has to deal with LAN-WAN traffic.

              I can break anything.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.