Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Single Wan Multi LAN DHCP-server Problem (SOLVED)

    2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    4
    8
    3.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      Metu69salemi
      last edited by

      After I upgraded to 2.0 RC1 i've started to have dhcp server problems a lot.

      Before upgrading everything worked well (1.2.3). I even changed harddrive and reinstalled 2.0RC1 from to ground up.
      Firmware is up to date.

      Is there anything what i can do? Other than to manually configure static ip's to clients

      For saving time: I had faulty ip-addressing scheme for openvpn networks, and by removing that dhcpd booted up..

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GruensFroeschliG
        GruensFroeschli
        last edited by

        You're not telling what problems you have…...

        We do what we must, because we can.

        Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          Metu69salemi
          last edited by

          Yes indeed sorry.

          The problem is that dhcp servers doesn't work.
          Interfaces is configured as static, DHCP-server is enabled but not even one client have IP-addresses from firewall.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GruensFroeschliG
            GruensFroeschli
            last edited by

            Do you have a firewall rule to allow DHCP traffic?
            Only a rule to allow the "interface_subnet" is not enough.
            Afaik there was once a version which didn't require such a rule.

            Sorry was thinking of DHCP and bridges here….

            We do what we must, because we can.

            Asking questions the smart way: http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              Metu69salemi
              last edited by

              Thank you for the answer but it still doesn't work

              no matter if set that rule really specific or simple(kiss is good guideline)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                cmb
                last edited by

                On interfaces where the DHCP server is enabled, the rules to allow DHCP requests are automatically added. Not enough info here to tell what's happening, DHCP logs, system logs, status of dhcpd under Status>Services, may be helpful.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • W
                  wallabybob
                  last edited by

                  @cmb:

                  On interfaces where the DHCP server is enabled, the rules to allow DHCP requests are automatically added.

                  I presume "rules" means "firewall rules". This must be a relatively new feature. In my system running 2.0-RC1-IPv6 (i386)
                  built on Wed Apr 6 23:30:13 EDT 2011
                  I have DHCP enabled on LAN (bridge0) and I can't see any "automatic" rules to allow DHCP. A while ago (maybe a couple of months) I had to add firewall rules to each of the bridge member interfaces to allow from 0.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255 for DHCP to work. Those rules are visible.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    Metu69salemi
                    last edited by

                    Thank you to all

                    I had faulty setup concerning openvpn interface. And that why dhcpd was shut all the time and refused to start itself or by manually.
                    After i corrected setup then dhcp was started by itself.

                    @cmb: thank you i didn't know the location for the dhcpd or other services
                    @wallabybob & GruensFroeschli: I put that rule for optional networks, thank you for your advice.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.