Problem with ms rdp

tommie

Hi,

I am unable to set up a nat rule for ms rdp. However my other forwards are working. It looks a problem in the interface.

I have setup a nat rule to redirect 3389 to my internal ip… however i get:

tommie@justin:~$ telnet myhostname.be 3389
Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host

if i change the source port to 3390 in the nat rule and leave the rest like it was, I get:
tommie@justin:~$ telnet myhostname.be 3390
Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx...
Connected to myhostname.be.
Escape character is '^]'.

Is there a solution available or am i able to change it in the config file directly?

Regards
tommie

hoba

Try configuring miniupnp. This way the msn messenger can dynamically open needed ports itself. It's included in recent snapshots (http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/) and can be found in the services menu.

tommie

I'm sorry but I don't see what this has to do with a remote desktop connection? It is only one port it should use…

mmm strange i just changed the port back from 3390 to 3389 and now it works :S I am going crazy :-)

sullrich

@tommie:

I'm sorry but I don't see what this has to do with a remote desktop connection? It is only one port it should use…

mmm strange i just changed the port back from 3390 to 3389 and now it works :S I am going crazy :-)

You should not need a source port in the rule… The description says that its only needed 1% of the time and this is not one of them.

hoba

@tommie:

I'm sorry but I don't see what this has to do with a remote desktop connection? It is only one port it should use…

I somehow misread something, sorry.

yoda715

Your description of your problem is not totally clear, but here is how the NAT should look for RDP:

If Proto Ext. port range NAT IP Int. port range
WAN TCP 3389 (MS RDP) Internal PC 3389 (MS RDP)

The firewall rule will then look something like this:
Proto Source Src Port Destination IP Dst Port
TCP Any * Internal PC 3389 (MS RDP)

If you chance the NAT Internal Port Range, you have to modify the Firewall rule Dst Port to reflect the same change. In other words your Int Port Range, NAT IP in your NAT and the DstIP, Dst Port in the firewall rule must always match.

The only other problem that I can see is that the machine running terminal server is listening on 3390 instead of 3389. Do a google search on how to change this back to 3389 if you need to.