• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

How to: Get CPU temp

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
140 Posts 24 Posters 115.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
    last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 8:00 PM

    Why on earth would you downgrade to 1.2.3 just because 2.0 x64 doesn't work? Why not use 2.0 x32? It works fine.

    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

    Do not Chat/PM for help!

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • A
      asterix
      last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 8:44 PM

      To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, but after trying RC snapshots since as early as Jan this year, I have started to like 1.2.3 better and despite trying the latest RC3 snapshots from time to time, I keep coming back to 1.2.3.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 8:48 PM

        @asterix:

        To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, […]

        It's just you. :-)

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          RedRep
          last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 9:15 PM

          Coretemp.ko for 1.2.3 attached below, rename to Coretemp.ko

          coretemp.ko.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            johnnybe
            last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 10:11 PM

            @jimp:

            @asterix:

            To be honest, I find 1.2.3 a bit more stable and far more responsive than 2.0RC3. It maybe just me, […]

            It's just you. :-)

            You should consider: asterix was hit by a menhir.

            you would not believe the view up here

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              asterix
              last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 11:00 PM

              jimp,
              you twisted my words or you read it incorrectly.

              I said "it may be just me" but I like 1.2.3 better than 2.0 despite trying the latest snapshots from time to time.

              Also 1.2.3 HAS been extremely stable and responsive for me.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                asterix
                last edited by Aug 10, 2011, 11:00 PM

                RedRep .. Thank you !!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • X
                  xbipin
                  last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 5:56 AM

                  can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    seh2000
                    last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 10:47 AM

                    @xbipin:

                    can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

                    and for i386 as well?!
                    Steen

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                      last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 10:53 AM

                      It still needs some additional code to allow it to be switched on/off or to auto detect it in order to prevent it showing some ugly error on machines without the correct hardware/driver.

                      Steve

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        seh2000
                        last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 11:06 AM

                        @stephenw10:

                        It still needs some additional code to allow it to be switched on/off or to auto detect it in order to prevent it showing some ugly error on machines without the correct hardware/driver.

                        Steve

                        Hi Steve!
                        How you are :)
                        Yes, fully understood and not expected by "tomorrow" if you understand what I mean.
                        Maybe in form of a package, then one can install if ones HW/drivers support one can install.
                        Cheers Steen

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by Aug 11, 2011, 2:56 PM

                          @xbipin:

                          can this be included by default in nanobsd snaps?

                          It isn't even on the full snaps by default, so probably not.

                          If/when it's a package it should be possible to use on both.

                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            asterix
                            last edited by Aug 21, 2011, 7:33 PM

                            So.. has consideration been given to add this package to the snapshots?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J
                              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                              last edited by Aug 21, 2011, 8:09 PM

                              As stated before, it wouldn't make it into snapshots. A package is not "in the snapshots" it's in the package system. If someone can make a package from this, that would be great, but so far it doesn't appear that anyone has had the time or inclination to do so.

                              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                              Do not Chat/PM for help!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                                last edited by Aug 22, 2011, 12:20 AM

                                I have to say I'm finding this mod surprisingly useful. I thought it would be a fun novelty but it's actually giving me useful information about the state of my box. It actually gets surprisingly hot in the middle of the day when I'm not there.  ::)

                                Steve

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • G
                                  genic
                                  last edited by Aug 22, 2011, 3:45 AM

                                  it would be VERY useful to have this information in a rrd graph on the system tab. it could even be thrown into the processor info.

                                  again…it would be VERY useful!

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    seh2000
                                    last edited by Aug 22, 2011, 10:49 AM

                                    @genic:

                                    it would be VERY useful to have this information in a rrd graph on the system tab. it could even be thrown into the processor info.

                                    again…it would be VERY useful!

                                    Yes it would, I wish I had the skills to make such a package.
                                    Steen

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      Metu69salemi
                                      last edited by Aug 22, 2011, 10:58 AM

                                      Why not to create a bounty of this packaging?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        seh2000
                                        last edited by Aug 22, 2011, 11:09 AM

                                        @Metu69salemi:

                                        Why not to create a bounty of this packaging?

                                        Could be a good idea, wonder how many here are interested and thereby share the "bounty"?!

                                        BR// Steen

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          Metu69salemi
                                          last edited by Aug 22, 2011, 11:22 AM

                                          20$, currently not using, but might be good addon to community

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                            This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                            consent.not_received