Postfix - antispam and relay package
-
this is just a relay server.
Inbound or outbound?
Is there a way to tell the package not to write the whole section?
you can edit snort.inc and comment this part.
-
Hi all
I'm trying to get the mail search to work with no luck.
All setting are correct as fare as i know
Loggin Destination to /var/log/maillog
Update Sqlite frequency every minute
and i have inlcude /^Subject:/ WARN line in Acl Headersdoing a tail -f /var/log/maillog shows lines like this
postfix/cleanup[22445]: 9249F114D0: warning: header Subject: test from mail.####.noBut no other db files than postscreen_cache.db and verify_cache.db
is showing up in /var/db/postfix2.1-RELEASE (i386)
built on Wed Sep 11 18:16:22 EDT 2013
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11
Postfix 2.10.2 pkg v.2.3.7Any suggestions on what to try next ?
-
Hi Marcello,
thanks for your kind attention.
It's juts an inboud relay to block spammers, I'm not uysing it as outbound relay.
One update: I removed the recipient section by editing postfx.inc file, still the problem of postfix not being able to communicate to the destination server on port 25 remains.
So I used the portforward to localhost and everything started working again.
Would you accept a "feature request" here like adding a "Don't verify recipients" checkbox to the interface in order not to generate thet part of the main.cf?
ByeAlberto
-
Hi
Thanks Marcello for this great package.
someone can help me with the mail search function ?
I have made the configurationTo use Diagnostics -> Search mail you need to:
Select Loggin Destination to /var/log/maillog (done)
Select update Sqlite frequency (every minute)
Inlcude /^Subject:/ WARN line in Acl Headers after all your Subject rules (done).
In my var log i have the WARN for header
Apr 10 09:35:32 disbox-utm postfix/cleanup[9968]: D117313C4F4: warning: header Subject:
and some NOQUEUE
Apr 10 09:35:52 disbox-utm postfix/postscreen[8797]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
yyyy-mm-dd.db are created in /var/db/postfix/ but they are empty
I dont understand what i'm doing wrong
Thanks for your help !
-
check if cron is set and try to run it on console.
-
Hi marcelloc
@marcelloc:check if cron is set and try to run it on console.
My cron is empty
where is the commande i need to run in console
I have another question can i modify the message add to every mail
Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner
pour des virus ou des polluriels et rien de
suspect n'a été trouvé.
MailScanner remercie transtec pour son soutien.[update]
I have found the command normaly created with the GUI
I have found where i can edit the MailScanner
I think i have an issue with the interface when i modify something in the configuration, nothing change
I have add the LDAP in recipients no cron was createdMy version of pfSENSE is : 2.1.2-RELEASE (amd64)
with this packages:- Postfixe Forwarder is 2.10.2 pkg v.2.3.7
- MailScanner 4.84.6 pkg v.0.2.4
- HAVP Antivirus 0.91_1 pkg v1.01
- Squid3 0.91_1 pkg v1.01
- squidGuard-squid3 1.4_4 pkg v.1.9.5
I think i have an issu with the GUI
Thanks.
-
Hi,
I think I found a small bug in the current version of the postfix forwarder package.
If I set postfix to only listen on my WAN interface, I get a not working configuration:
The connection to my internal mailserver is refused, although everything else is configured right and the mailserver is in fact reachable!
The log states "relay=none" (??)–--
Apr 18 17:41:03 fw postfix/smtp[40257]: connect to 192.168.135.10[192.168.135.10]:25: Connection refused
Apr 18 17:41:03 fw postfix/smtp[40257]: 8FAAE3C04BA: to=administrator@mydomain.de, relay=none, delay=566, delays=566/0.01/0.02/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to 192.168.135.10[192.168.135.10]:25: Connection refused)
–--If I select "Listen on all interfaces/ip addresses" instead, it starts working and the mails are delivered:
–--
Apr 18 17:50:53 fw postfix/postfix-script[921]: refreshing the Postfix mail system
Apr 18 17:50:53 fw postfix/master[9869]: reload – version 2.10.2, configuration /usr/pbi/postfix-i386/etc/postfix
Apr 18 17:50:53 fw postfix/master[9869]: warning: service 25: ignoring inet_interfaces change
Apr 18 17:50:53 fw postfix/master[9869]: warning: to change inet_interfaces, stop and start Postfix
Apr 18 17:50:53 fw postfix/qmgr[1595]: 8FAAE3C04BA: from=the@sender.de, size=236, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Apr 18 17:50:54 fw postfix/smtp[2007]: 8FAAE3C04BA: to=administrator@mydomain.de, relay=192.168.135.10[192.168.135.10]:25, delay=1156, delays=1156/0.01/0.03/0.51, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 0a3df1d7-0ec3-4338-ad9d-7bdd1509cc6f@SBS2011.company.local [InternalId=7375] Queued mail for delivery)
–--BUT only until the next RESTART of postfix service!
Then I get this error:
–---
Apr 18 17:53:07 fw postfix/postfix-script[26351]: starting the Postfix mail system
Apr 18 17:53:07 fw postfix/master[26926]: fatal: /usr/pbi/postfix-i386/etc/postfix/master.cf: line 1: no valid IP address found: 25
Apr 18 17:53:08 fw postfix/master[26649]: fatal: daemon initialization failure
Apr 18 17:53:09 fw postfix/postfix-script[27153]: fatal: mail system startup failed
–---The problem could be that the parameter "inet_interfaces" in main.cf is set to an empty value.
Shouldn't this be set to "all" in this case?A currently working setup for me is to select all three "LAN + WAN + loopback" as listen interfaces!
In an older version of postfix package this wasn't necessary.
Regards
Dennis/administrator@mydomain.de/the@sender.de/administrator@mydomain.de -
I too am having the same issue after upgrading to 2.1.2 i386, gathering info for more detailed post.
-
Listen on loopback instead.
Have a read of this: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=70541.0
-
How do you handle IPv6? My setup must listen on ipv6 as well as the IP4 addresses, not sure why things strayed from normal behavior of master.cf. If you specify multiple postscreen master.cf entries as is done when selecting multiple interfaces in the gui in the past would produce errors if multiple postscreen processes trying to hit a single runtime db. So unless someone can suggest an alternative I think that restoring the master.cf functionality to what was previously no issue is t
-
postfix 2.11 was released in January and, among other things, it contains the following enhancement:
- A new postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold feature to allow
clients to skip postscreen tests based on their DNSBL score.
This can eliminate email delays due to "after 220 greeting"
protocol tests, which otherwise require that a client reconnects
before it can deliver mail. Some providers such as Google don't
retry from the same IP address, and that can result in large
email delivery delays.
Any chance of an updated package based on postfix 2.11?
- A new postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold feature to allow
-
postfix 2.11 was released in January and, among other things, it contains the following enhancement:
- A new postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold feature to allow
clients to skip postscreen tests based on their DNSBL score.
This can eliminate email delays due to "after 220 greeting"
protocol tests, which otherwise require that a client reconnects
before it can deliver mail. Some providers such as Google don't
retry from the same IP address, and that can result in large
email delivery delays.
Any chance of an updated package based on postfix 2.11?
Oh yes please!
- A new postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold feature to allow
-
Hello
Is there any way to configure ssl authentication on the relay server? my mail server is configured to listen on port 465 with ssl and I don't know how to relay the messages to that port
Best regards, ChildrenOfSolium
-
Hello
I would like to disable all anti-spam in postfix because I use a custom Milter plugin.
How can I disable reject_unknown_sender_domain or smtpd_helo_required ?Thank you.
Parameters in "custom mail.cf" field are not applied because of precedence as you can see:
mynetworks = /usr/pbi/postfix-i386/etc/postfix/mynetwork_table mynetworks_style = host access_map_reject_code= 554 access_map_defer_code = 451 unverified_recipient_reject_code = 550 unknown_client_reject_code = 550 unknown_hostname_reject_code = 550 smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit # not applied! smtpd_milters = inet:<milter ip="">:7830 milter_default_action = reject show_user_unknown_table_name = no smtpd_helo_required = no # not applied! bounce_queue_lifetime = 0d relay_domains = mydomain.com transport_maps = hash:/usr/pbi/postfix-i386/etc/postfix/transport local_recipient_maps = relay_recipient_maps = hash:/usr/pbi/postfix-i386/etc/postfix/relay_recipients mydestination = mynetworks_style = host message_size_limit = 10240000 default_process_limit = 100 #Just reject after helo,sender,client,recipient tests smtpd_delay_reject = yes # Don't talk to mail systems that don't know their own hostname. smtpd_helo_required = yes smtpd_sender_restrictions = reject_unknown_sender_domain, permit</milter>
-
postfix 2.11 was released in January and, among other things, it contains the following enhancement:
- A new postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold feature to allow
clients to skip postscreen tests based on their DNSBL score.
This can eliminate email delays due to "after 220 greeting"
protocol tests, which otherwise require that a client reconnects
before it can deliver mail. Some providers such as Google don't
retry from the same IP address, and that can result in large
email delivery delays.
Any chance of an updated package based on postfix 2.11?
Oh yes please!
second that!
- A new postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold feature to allow
-
Sorry, yaboc, Bismarck is second. You'll have to go third :)
If Google is your main problem and you missed this post, give it a try.
It is a bit of a "broad brush" but it's been working well for me.
-
Hi All
I have the postfix package all set up and working, forwarding all incoming mail to a next hop internal MTA.
I would also like to BCC all mail to an address used by an external mail scanning system.
As far as I understand, this should be as easy as adding the following line to the custom main.cf section in the pfSense WebUI:
always_bcc = archive@ <internal ip="" of="" mta="">However… It's not working.
Does anyone have any suggestions to troubleshoot this or an alternate way to achieve the same end-result.
Many thanks for your time!
Cheers</internal>
-
Hi Guys,
i am just new here although i am using pfsense since a while for different purposes in a vmware environment.
So far i am really happy.But i have one concern & problem i discovered today around the postfix-forwarder package :
Domains added in the "forward" tab shouldn't be added to relay_domains in main.cf per default.
Since transports and relay_domains are two totally different things.I'd suggest to run a regex over the aggregated relay_recipients and filter out the domain parts and include those automatically
or make a checkbox next to each domain to include it in relay_domains.
But still this doesn't make much sense and i cannot see the reason in defining a specific transport - and then delivery to these domains fails since the recipients in that domain are not listed in relay_recipients…And yes it makes sense, to separate, just think about having several vpn connections - so you want to send mail from i.e. branch offices to main offices to the internal mail server via vpn, without knowing who is a valid recipient there.
Otherwise callback verify should be enabled, so on delivery attempts to domains in the transport section postfix runs a test against the defined mail server to check if that one is accepting mail for that recipient.Anyway some might say this should be properly solved with DNS - but i tend to disagree since this is rendering the transports useless.
What do you guys think ?
For now, i fixed it by putting my actual relay_domains into postfix.inc and commented out the part where it adds the transport domains to relay_domains. -
Hi All
I have the postfix package all set up and working, forwarding all incoming mail to a next hop internal MTA.
I would also like to BCC all mail to an address used by an external mail scanning system.
As far as I understand, this should be as easy as adding the following line to the custom main.cf section in the pfSense WebUI:
always_bcc = archive@ <internal ip="" of="" mta="">However… It's not working.
Does anyone have any suggestions to troubleshoot this or an alternate way to achieve the same end-result.
Many thanks for your time!
Cheers</internal>
Hi All,
Maybe I can give a little more information here!
The config I add in the custom area in the WebUI is not seen when I use```
postconfI have restarted postfix so it should be generating new config. Any ideas? Thanks
-
Sorry, yaboc, Bismarck is second. You'll have to go third :)
If Google is your main problem and you missed this post, give it a try.
It is a bit of a "broad brush" but it's been working well for me.
ha as long as it gets implemented i can wait ;) thanks for the google list biggsy, but there are other emails that we get from same domain / multiple MTAs and it's annoying. sometimes it can take hours for the mail to finally come through.
also i noticed 'permit' is used per line whereas the HINT says to use OK / REJECT
i put OK and see if it works for google servers.Thanks