Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfBlocker

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    896 Posts 143 Posters 1.5m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • chpalmerC
      chpalmer
      last edited by

      From Countryblocks site…

      We have temporarily suspended certain services as our donation stream has suffered a significant decrease here in the fourth quarter. We are pursuing some other financing options to help us focus on providing you with our services. This temporary suspension may last a few hours or a few days. If you would like to help us expedite the process please consider making a donation to Country IP Blocks through the PayPal link (on their site)

      Triggering snowflakes one by one..
      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T
        tommyboy180
        last edited by

        If you can, please donate to Country IP Blocks

        Site: http://www.countryipblocks.net/

        We need to support this site.

        -Tom Schaefer
        SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

        Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • RonpfSR
          RonpfS
          last edited by

          @marcelloc:

          Just released version 0.1.4.6 with fixes in float rules check and about section in gui.

          Reinstalled, Floating rules are still there after a pfBlocker save, great  ::)
          Counter updates when pinging from pfsense box.
          Counter is reseted on firewall rule changes.

          When I select loopback interface, where does it put the rules?

          2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
          Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
          Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • marcellocM
            marcelloc
            last edited by

            @RonpfS:

            When I select loopback interface, where does it put the rules?

            Nothing  :)

            As we only use pfsense's framework components, interface selection includes loopback.

            If you select just loopback, pfBlocker send you a warning.

            Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

            Help a community developer! ;D

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • RonpfSR
              RonpfS
              last edited by

              On reinstall we always get the Reload status missing alias error: php: : New alert found: # unresolvable dest aliases
              This is because pfBlocker is disabled by default on install.

              if you click ACKNOWLEDGE ALL in the Package Installer window, you ended up with:

              Installation of  FAILED!
              -------------------------
              Installation halted.
              
              

              Everything is fine and working after you enable pfBlocker.

              2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
              Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
              Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • marcellocM
                marcelloc
                last edited by

                @RonpfS:

                On reinstall we always get the Reload status missing alias error: php: : New alert found: # unresolvable dest aliases

                Please, remove custom alias before removing package.
                pfBlocker is just doing what you asked him to do (do not touch my rules).

                @RonpfS:

                if you click ACKNOWLEDGE ALL in the Package Installer window, you ended up with:

                Installation of  FAILED!
                -------------------------
                Installation halted.
                
                

                when you click ACKNOWLEDGE ALL you reload the page, and then get a 'reinstallation' error.

                This is not related to pfBlocker.

                Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                Help a community developer! ;D

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • marcellocM
                  marcelloc
                  last edited by

                  I've pushed a fix in cron call to check if pfBlocker is enabled or not.

                  if you have installed pfBlocker before now + 15 min, reinstall package.

                  Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                  Help a community developer! ;D

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • RonpfSR
                    RonpfS
                    last edited by

                    Done.
                    Everything is running fine.

                    2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                    Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                    Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • marcellocM
                      marcelloc
                      last edited by

                      Great news, thanks for your feedback.

                      Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                      Help a community developer! ;D

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kilko
                        last edited by

                        I'm running on Alix 2D13.
                        Installed pfSense-1.2.3-RELEASE-2g-nanobsd.img.gz on a 2GB card.
                        Version 2.0-RELEASE (i386) built on Tue Sep 13 18:02:53 EDT 2011
                        Platform nanobsd (2g)
                        CPU Type Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS
                        Uptime 31 days +


                        I'm running Peerblocker on a local windows xp machine.
                        Is is possible to have a stripped down pfsense server - to do the same job as peerblocker (http://www.peerblock.com/) ?
                        (it now has 2.301.808.963 IPs and counting..)

                        Or should I look else where ?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          eri--
                          last edited by

                          It seems that peerblocker is another thing and meant for windows.

                          Unless you convince a unix knowledgable to port it to unix i do not think you will have much success in that way.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            tommyboy180
                            last edited by

                            @kilko:

                            I'm running on Alix 2D13.
                            Installed pfSense-1.2.3-RELEASE-2g-nanobsd.img.gz on a 2GB card.
                            Version 2.0-RELEASE (i386) built on Tue Sep 13 18:02:53 EDT 2011
                            Platform nanobsd (2g)
                            CPU Type Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS
                            Uptime 31 days +


                            I'm running Peerblocker on a local windows xp machine.
                            Is is possible to have a stripped down pfsense server - to do the same job as peerblocker (http://www.peerblock.com/) ?
                            (it now has 2.301.808.963 IPs and counting..)

                            Or should I look else where ?

                            pfBlocker does the same job as peerblocker. pfBlocker replaces IP-Blocklist and IP-Blocklist was created to mimic peerblocker. You can use the same lists that you are using in peerblocker and apply them to pfBlocker. This way you get protection not just on a single machine but your entire network.

                            pfBlocker is Peerblock for pfsense.

                            -Tom Schaefer
                            SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

                            Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • I
                              ipv6kid
                              last edited by

                              We need a way to verify that PfBlocker is downloading lists properly and blocking. It should display the number of IP's being blocked from downloaded lists.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T
                                tommyboy180
                                last edited by

                                @ipv6kid:

                                We need a way to verify that PfBlocker is downloading lists properly and blocking. It should display the number of IP's being blocked from downloaded lists.

                                There is. Marcello built that into the widget. You can add it on the home page HUD by pressing the '+' button.

                                This widget counts the CIDRs currently applied in your tables that pfblocker creates.

                                -Tom Schaefer
                                SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

                                Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • I
                                  ipv6kid
                                  last edited by

                                  @ Tommyboy - Thanks for that I did not know to look at the widget.

                                  I am getting the following error with PFblocker now. It reports "out of memory" but RAM usage is only about 53%:

                                  : The command '/sbin/pfctl -o basic -f /tmp/rules.debug' returned exit code '1', the output was '/tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table pfBlockerLevel1Inbound: Cannot allocate memory /tmp/rules.debug:22: cannot define table pfBlockerLevel1Outbound: Cannot allocate memory pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded'

                                  Does anybody know how to remedy this?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • I
                                    ipv6kid
                                    last edited by

                                    Getting more errors:

                                    There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:20: cannot define table pfBlockerLevel1Inbound: Cannot allocate memory
                                    /tmp/rules.debug:22: cannot define table pfBlockerLevel1Outbound: Cannot allocate memory
                                    /tmp/rules.debug:36: cannot define table pfBlockerPrimaryThreats: Cannot allocate memory
                                    pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded The line in question reads [20]: table <pfblockerlevel1inbound>persist file "/var/db/aliastables/pfBlockerLevel1Inbound.txt"

                                    My router is a laptop router and is not out of memory.</pfblockerlevel1inbound>

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T
                                      tommyboy180
                                      last edited by

                                      ipv6kid,

                                      • Increase even more Firewall Maximum Table Entries

                                      • clear ipblocklist table in diagnostics-> table

                                      • check if the value of table-entries in /tmp/rules.debug is the same in Firewall Maximum Table Entries

                                      • check also if table-entries is declared twice in /tmp/rules.debug

                                      This should correct your errors. Basically what is happening is system variable has set a ceiling on the tables. You can manually override this by changing that value to allow larger tables.

                                      -Tom Schaefer
                                      SuperMicro 1U 2X Intel pro/1000 Dual Core Intel 2.2 Ghz - 2 Gig RAM

                                      Please support pfBlocker | File Browser | Strikeback

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • marcellocM
                                        marcelloc
                                        last edited by

                                        ipv6kid,

                                        Also check lists description. Level1 ipblocklist includes only 'good' networks.

                                        Blocking a grey list may not be a good choice.

                                        Treinamentos de Elite: http://sys-squad.com

                                        Help a community developer! ;D

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • I
                                          ipv6kid
                                          last edited by

                                          First, thanks for the reply. I have set the maximum Firewall tables to 550,000 just to be safe but under Diagnostics > Tables there is no PFblocker drop down selection.

                                          I am still getting memory allocation errors even though I've done all of this and reset the states. Could it be anything else?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • I
                                            ipv6kid
                                            last edited by

                                            You said to make sure I didn't have double "table-entries", what if I used the same list to deny inbound and outbound? Would that cause this error?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.