Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Advice needed on a board for a 100mbit line

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    8 Posts 6 Posters 2.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      Peter Kaagman
      last edited by

      Hi there,

      I'm orientating on a a router solution for a 100mbit point 2 point connection. Have been playing around with an Alix 2D13 board which maxed out around 53mbit (no NAT, no rules). Looking at the sizing of pfSense this would be about accurate: it states 21-50mbit with a 500mhz processor. This would be a bit of a waste since we pay a lot of money to have 100mbit.  So I started looking around for a better performing board.
      The applianceshop.eu allso has OPNsense boxes with 1.1 or 1.6 gigahertz processors (and gigabit ethernet), which should max out at 850mbit according to the brochure. But it is a big leap from a 140 euro Alix board (including enclosure) to a 500-600 euro OPNsense box.

      Do you guys know a board in between those 2?

      Peter

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jasonlitka
        last edited by

        Any Atom box with Gig-E ports will meet your needs provided all you use is the firewall.  If you're running VPN, snort, squid, L7, etc. then you'll fall short.

        Try something like this:

        http://www.mini-box.com/Mini-Box-M350-Barebone-System

        I can break anything.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          slth
          last edited by

          Please don't build another atom system in 2011!

          You'd be WAY better of using a socket 1155 system:

          -Much and much better performance
          -Lower total system idle power consumption
          -More capable for future extension
          -About the same price or in some cases even cheaper

          IIRC theres also a thread on this platform

          Any questions? Just ask :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            Peter Kaagman
            last edited by

            found a (locked) topic from 2008 on the via nab 7500

            anyone tested it yet? looks like a nice board…

            edit:
            never mind.... the Via C7 processor is not on the compatibility list... kinda hard testing it I guess

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              asterix
              last edited by

              As "slth" suggested.. don't waste your time and money on an Atom build. They are under performers and definitely will "not" be able to support a 100Mbit WAN.

              Invest in a i3/i5 1155 mini-ITX system with at least 2GB RAM. It would run you close to about $380 to $410 or even less if you know where to shop from. The performance will be up to par and will have power savings too as i3/i5 are way better than their predecessors in terms of power consumption especially when idle.

              I have now about 60 users on a i5 system supporting two 50Mbit lines simultaneously without a hitch.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stephenw10S
                stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                last edited by

                Any of the dual core Atoms will easily handle a 100Mbps WAN connection. See results with a D510 here. Over 200Mbps NAT/firewall throughput.
                However if you ever decide to add packages or use VPN extensively you may run out of processing power.

                Steve

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  Jarpse
                  last edited by

                  A VIA processor should work, but I don't think they perform well.

                  An Atom should be a good choice, or a system built on the newer 1155 socket. A Core i3 will consume more, but will be very, very fast.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stephenw10S
                    stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                    last edited by

                    I think that, as asterix pointed out above, the point is that in fact a Core i3 system may in fact be very similar power consumtion to an Atom. Especially of the system is loaded. For example see:
                    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/d510mo-intel-atom,2616-11.html
                    And that is with the firs generatino i3. The newer Sandybridge chips are far more efficient.

                    Steve

                    Edit: Here are some interesting figures for the newer model:
                    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i3-2100t_11.html#sect0

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.