• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Constantly reloading rules

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
14 Posts 4 Posters 4.9k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K
    killah
    last edited by Mar 25, 2007, 9:00 PM

    What could be the problem that filter rules are constantly reloading with no errors??

    How can I stop this, because it consumes processor all time?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • H
      hoba
      last edited by Mar 25, 2007, 9:06 PM

      What version are you using? If it's one of the latest snapshots please read the snapshotwarning at the forum mainpage, newssection (fading area on top). If you already run such a snapshot I recommend upgrading though the new feature is not yet done.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        killah
        last edited by Mar 25, 2007, 9:15 PM

        I'm running 1.0.1 built on Sun Oct 29 01:45:08 UTC 2006

        Can you tell Me please what determines that rules are already reloaded?
        How can I stop this?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          hoba
          last edited by Mar 25, 2007, 9:54 PM

          Haven't see such a problem with 1.0.1 release yet (nor with any other version actually). Can you show us your systemlogs? Does a reboot fix it?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            killah
            last edited by Mar 26, 2007, 9:49 AM Mar 26, 2007, 9:47 AM

            Sometimes there are no errors reloading rules.

            Sometimes I get someting like this:
            Acknowledge All    .:.    03-26-07 06:11:44 - [filter_load]There where error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Device busy The line in question reads [ DIOCADDRULE]:    .:.

            Reboot helps (for some time)..

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              sullrich
              last edited by Mar 26, 2007, 3:02 PM

              Haven't seen anything like this.  Perhaps you should reinstall.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                killah
                last edited by Mar 26, 2007, 8:46 PM

                It's fresh copy.. So, reinstalling is not a solution.

                What happens after I click "Apply Changes" when editing rules?? Which files are processed?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jeroen234
                  last edited by Mar 27, 2007, 5:15 AM

                  confi.xml is them rewritten
                  and then reread

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • H
                    hoba
                    last edited by Mar 27, 2007, 6:05 AM

                    Any chance this is a carp cluster and you set up some syncing loop (master->slave->master->slave->…)?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      killah
                      last edited by Mar 27, 2007, 2:32 PM

                      Nope.. It's not CARP cluster. I have dual WAN Internet connection with Load balancer turned on. I guess I know what was the reason. As a matter of fact there were two.. :)

                      First - one of My ISP was messing with My ADSL connection. (there should be an option in Load balancer to adjust time of finding that one of connections is offline)
                      Second - I added some rules to /etc/crontab wrong way. (My bad)

                      Problem solved.. :)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H
                        hoba
                        last edited by Mar 27, 2007, 2:48 PM

                        @killah:

                        First - one of My ISP was messing with My ADSL connection. (there should be an option in Load balancer to adjust time of finding that one of connections is offline)

                        We raised the timeoutlevel for the linkdown detection in newer snapshots to be not that sensitive anymore so this should be fixed (unless your link is really really bad).

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          killah
                          last edited by Mar 27, 2007, 5:48 PM

                          Super, it will be helpful! But time of reaction should be balanced too, not too quick not too slow. It would be nice if I could define it Myself..

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • H
                            hoba
                            last edited by Mar 27, 2007, 6:37 PM

                            Afaik it's hardcoded in the slbd binary and therefor not that easily configurable but I might be wrong here.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              sullrich
                              last edited by Mar 27, 2007, 6:52 PM

                              @hoba:

                              Afaik it's hardcoded in the slbd binary and therefor not that easily configurable but I might be wrong here.

                              You are absolutely correct.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              14 out of 14
                              • First post
                                14/14
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                                This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                                consent.not_received