Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Outgoing load balancing problem

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    3 Posts 3 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      naveed009
      last edited by

      i have two Wan for one Lan

      I used the recommendations for load balancing under pfsense 2.0 RC3, ie do nothing but
      (i) define a group for both gateways under system => routing => groups,
      (ii) change the rule from LAN to Gateway under firewall => rules => lan so it uses the gateway group,
      (iii) enable both checkboxes under System => advanced => misc for "Use sticky connections" and "Allow default gateway switching", and
      (iv) I have also installed lusca-cache package.

      My Load and Balancing is not working only use one gateway that I make default.
      Please help my why its not working.

      Thanks in advance.
      pf.JPG
      pf.JPG_thumb
      pf2.JPG
      pf2.JPG_thumb

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        KyferEz
        last edited by

        Can you ping an internet IP address such as 208.67.222.222 (opendns server) through the WAN connection that is Not default? If so, the dns resolution is not working and it is likely the same problem as I just posted here: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,43982.0.html

        Home Lab:
        Dell r310 Quad core 32GB RAM & 4 3TB SAS
        Intel Server 2 Quad core 24GB RAM & 6 2TB SAS
        Dell r410 Dual Hex core 24GB RAM & 4 1TB SAS
        HP Proliant DL380 Gen7 2 Quad core 24GB RAM & 6 1TB SAS
        28port POE Gb Cisco SG300-28P
        24port POE Gb Managed Netgear
        24port Catalyst Switch
        Cicso 1900 router
        OPNsense
        Sophos UTM
        6 NetScaler VPX3000
        2 VOIP phones Cisco SPA500
        Cisco Air SAP1602 AP

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          cmb
          last edited by

          Using Squid would be my guess, that's not adequate for Squid.

          On another note, remove the gateway from both of your first two rules. You want them there to avoid the policy routing, but you do not want the gateway there, that'll break connectivity to directly connected hosts on that subnet.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.