DHCPs assign wrong pools
-
try bridging lan -> opt1 instead of the reverse of that.
-
no tryed
LAN <-> OPT1
and
LAN -> OPT1neither of rhem are working….
Did any one got it to work? Why wouldnt u do it as ussually like StarOS has it, you craate the bridge and then assign mac addreses to it and everything works perfectly,,,, but here im going crazy.... whats a point of the router if it doesnt brige the interfaces? -
Yes it works fine, I have a bridge running here at my home.
Never seen StarOS, didn't know that we where required as developers to copy cat other software…
-
um… why it doesnt work here then... are u running EMbedded version?
PS: no u dont have to copy, but its all the same anyway... most of the opensorse modules...
-
um… why it doesnt work here then... are u running EMbedded version?
Not sure, as I said before it works fine here. In fact I just fired up another box and tested it with wireless bridge. Works fine.
PS: no u dont have to copy, but its all the same anyway… most of the opensorse modules...
Not quite. BSD and Linux are completely different animals.
-
lets keep the linux VS bsd discusion for other forum post…
what version do you have on your wrap box?
also do u know thw command to see the bridging tabls for if_bridge? -
lets keep the linux VS bsd discusion for other forum post…
Then don't proclaim that everything is the same. It is not.
what version do you have on your wrap box?
Who said I have a wrap? I have 10+ boxes all of which are on the latest version from http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/BETA2-BUGVALIDATION5/
also do u know thw command to see the bridging tabls for if_bridge?
ifconfig
-
looks strange too me then… ifconfig sais that the bridge0 is there and is between sis0 and sis2 so it should work i think...
do you know how I can check the bridge functionality in command prompt?
-
Show the contents of ifconfig
Have you rebooted the firewall by chance? How about the client?
-
i havent reboot any oh them… getting ipconfig now
-
Try rebooting.
For some reason my iMac will not obtain an IP until I reboot. I really don't know why this is the case and frankly I'm not interested in chasing it down since its such an easy remedy.
-
here is ifconfig… and im rebooting in meanwhile...
ath0: flags=8802 <broadcast,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500 ether 00:80:c8:17:e9:da media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier ssid "" channel 1 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 100 protmode CTS burst sis0: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500 options=8 <vlan_mtu>inet6 fe80::20d:b9ff:fe02:5a08%sis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:0d:b9:02:5a:08 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active sis1: flags=8843 <up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500 options=8 <vlan_mtu>inet6 fe80::20d:b9ff:fe02:5a09%sis1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 192.168.0.101 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:0d:b9:02:5a:09 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active sis2: flags=8943 <up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast>mtu 1500 options=8 <vlan_mtu>inet6 fe80::20d:b9ff:fe02:5a0a%sis2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 00:0d:b9:02:5a:0a media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier pfsync0: flags=41 <up,running>mtu 2020 pfsync: syncdev: lo0 maxupd: 128 pflog0: flags=100 <promisc>mtu 33208 lo0: flags=8048 <loopback,running,multicast>mtu 16384 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7 bridge0: flags=8043 <up,broadcast,running,multicast>mtu 1500 ether ac:de:48:21:1a:75 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 member: sis0 flags=7 <learning,discover,stp>port 2 priority 128 path cost 55 forwarding member: sis2 flags=7 <learning,discover,stp>port 4 priority 128 path cost 55 disabled</learning,discover,stp></learning,discover,stp></up,broadcast,running,multicast></loopback,running,multicast></promisc></up,running></vlan_mtu></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></vlan_mtu></up,broadcast,running,simplex,multicast></full-duplex></vlan_mtu></up,broadcast,running,promisc,simplex,multicast></broadcast,simplex,multicast> -
member: sis2 flags=7 <learning,discover,stp>port 4 priority 128 path cost 55 disabled
It's disabled. It won't forward. You have a ethernet loop?</learning,discover,stp>
-
i rebooted aint working… and u know that before me lol
what do u mean by loop?
-
It appears you are creating an ethernet loop by plugging the bridged segment into the same switch, etc.
If one of the members of the bridge is disabled then either the above is true or you don't have a cable plugged into the port.
-
yea, i got only one cable unluged… dont tell me that the i need to have 2 cables in in order for the bridge to work?
-
if that is the case then how do i make it to work that i can have 2 independant ports so that i can use eather one of them to be routed to the WAN port? Also if I want to route WLAN to WAN with one IP pool then i have to have LAN cable pluged in? That doesnt make any sense…
-
If all you want is access to the internet from etiher interface simply setup a seperate subnet for each interface and setup DHCP Server.
I've never heard of a 2-way bridge where only one port is plugged in – whats the point?!
-
the point is that lets say we have Wireless router and also it works as regular router… in all "comercial" products we have only one DHCP pool for the simplicity and easy managment... also we dont need to use LAN ethernet port to use Wireless.... in th your product what i amd getting is tha I have to have all cables pluged in in order to use the product with single DHCP.... or I have to set up dferent subnets but that makes my network scruwed up, espesially windows file sharing (because it hates different subnates)
next the captive portal, if I want to run in on both wireless and one of the lan ports simutaniously? normally all hotspots are limited to 1 port, so if you have "internal" bridge or logical bridge, then you bridge t ports togather and put the main port on the hotspot...
Probably we are talking about different types of bridges... what i mean is that i need "logical" bridge where 2 or more ports could be goined to one, its like I connect one routher port to the switch... so that I will have 2 ports and not one....
Did I make myself clear?
-
the point is that lets say we have Wireless router and also it works as regular router… in all "comercial" products we have only one DHCP pool for the simplicity and easy managment... also we dont need to use LAN ethernet port to use Wireless.... in th your product what i amd getting is tha I have to have all cables pluged in in order to use the product with single DHCP.... or I have to set up dferent subnets but that makes my network scruwed up, espesially windows file sharing (because it hates different subnates)
Huh? Whats the difference between a wireless router and one that works as a router?!? Isn't that the same thing?
next the captive portal, if I want to run in on both wireless and one of the lan ports simutaniously? normally all hotspots are limited to 1 port, so if you have "internal" bridge or logical bridge, then you bridge t ports togather and put the main port on the hotspot…
Captive portal will only operate on one interface at the same time.
Probably we are talking about different types of bridges… what i mean is that i need "logical" bridge where 2 or more ports could be goined to one, its like I connect one routher port to the switch... so that I will have 2 ports and not one....
I still fail to see the point of making two ports one if you are not going to plug 2 devices in. A bridge connects the two ports together therefore something must be plugged into them.
Did I make myself clear?
Nope, I'm even more confused. Perhaps you need to draw a visio diagram.