'pfctl: jme0_vlan10: driver does not support altq'



  • I'm trying to set up a traffic shaper. Strange install problems described here mean I'm running 2.1, but I don't think this is 2.1 specific.

    I'm running this on a Shuttle XS35v2 as a one-armed router, with a GS108T doing the vlan swtiching/tagging.

    Just following the wizard (single WAN, single LAN) and lowering the priority for p2p traffic leaves me with:

    The error I get is:

    php: : The command '/sbin/pfctl -o basic -f /tmp/rules.debug' returned exit code '1', the output was 'pfctl: jme0_vlan10: driver does not support altq'

    Is this because the combination of jme and vlan actually isn't supported, or am I doing something wrong?

    Or, is this a 2.1 bug after all? I've posted a couple of other issues in the 2.1 forum and haven't gotten any traction, so I thought I'd try out here.



  • That means jme does not support altq.



  • ermal,

    Does this mean em doesn't supported altq either in 2.1? It is for supported in 2.0.1. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,48074.msg253378.html#msg253378



  • ermal-
    I don't think that's the case, from the altq(4) man page:

    SUPPORTED DEVICES
        The driver modifications described in altq(9) are required to use a cer-
        tain network card with ALTQ.  They have been applied to the following
        hardware drivers: age(4), alc(4), ale(4), an(4), ath(4), aue(4), bce(4),
        bfe(4), bge(4), cas(4), dc(4), de(4), ed(4), em(4), ep(4), epair(4),
        fxp(4), gem(4), hme(4), ipw(4), iwi(4), jme(4), le(4), msk(4), mxge(4),
        my(4), nfe(4), nge(4), npe(4), nve(4), ral(4), re(4), rl(4), rum(4),
        sf(4), sge(4), sis(4), sk(4), ste(4), stge(4), txp(4), udav(4), ural(4),
        vge(4), vr(4), wi(4), and xl(4).

    So this is clearly something specific to vlans. If as Cino says it's broken for em, then this is must be a regression. I'd believe that not all the tricks are supported on cheap-and-nasty hardware like jme, but em? Really?



  • This is 2.1?



  • @ermal:

    This is 2.1?

    Yes, as I said in the initial post, this is 2.1.



  • Ermal opened a ticket on this.
    http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2349


Log in to reply