Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Accessing TMG cluster through pfSense…

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Routing and Multi WAN
    5 Posts 3 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      Sup3rior
      last edited by

      Hi,

      Does anyone have any experience placing a Microsoft TMG cluster behind a pfSense device?

      The TMG cluster, using Microsoft NLB, will be advertising a VIP on it's NLB interfaces as a unicast IP but with a multicast MAC address. Based on previous experience, I know most vendors require some additional configuration to get it working (for example Cisco needs a static ARP entry on it's routers, and without it either won't forward traffic or it only relays to one device even if it fails until the ARP table is updated).

      Is anything similar required on pfSense to have it working properly?

      Regards,
      Anders

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S Offline
        Supermule Banned
        last edited by

        Og du kan ikke løse det med ping af Master i dit CARP cluster?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S Offline
          Sup3rior
          last edited by

          @Supermule:

          Og du kan ikke løse det med ping af Master i dit CARP cluster?

          Let's keep things in English. so others may benefit from whatever conclusion there is…

          But to answer your question, there is no "master" in a TMG cluster in the sense of receiving and sending traffic, as there is in a pfSense CARP array. All nodes in a TMG cluster run as active, which is where the MAC address spoofing comes into the picture. Each node spoofs the MAC address of the NLB interface onto their own network interface, but as stated I've seens problems with other vendors.

          Before beginning on this project I wanted to see if anyone else had any prior experience. If not, I will post whatever conclusion I reach once the project is done.

          Regards,
          Anders

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Offline
            cmb
            last edited by

            AFAIK that should work without any additional considerations. Though I haven't tried it, nor recall of anyone trying it. Give it a shot and let us know what you find.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S Offline
              Sup3rior
              last edited by

              @cmb:

              AFAIK that should work without any additional considerations. Though I haven't tried it, nor recall of anyone trying it. Give it a shot and let us know what you find.

              That's the plan, once I get to it.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.