Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Bug in IPSec Dashboard widget?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    7 Posts 2 Posters 1.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rcfaR
      rcfa
      last edited by

      It seems suddently the IPsec widget gobbles up all widgets that are below it, and the look and act as if they were sub-widgets of the IPSec widget.

      Note the narrower title bars of the widgets following, and the lack of a white divider area.

      I deleted the IPSec widget, which seemingly deletes all the "subwidgets", too. But these then show up like normal upon a save. The moment I add the IPSec widget again, it's back to this odd behavior. This is rather new. I'm currently on build

      2.1-DEVELOPMENT (amd64)
      built on Sat May 26 23:51:01 EDT 2012
      FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p1
      
      

      Anyone else noticed this?
      ![Screen Shot 2012-05-28 at 10.33.09.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2012-05-28 at 10.33.09.png)
      ![Screen Shot 2012-05-28 at 10.33.09.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2012-05-28 at 10.33.09.png_thumb)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • rcfaR
        rcfa
        last edited by

        While on the subject: there also seems to be a formatting error, since the columns between labels and content in the tunnels tab don't line up.
        Also, if there are three tabs, why are they not taking up the full width of the widget? Would look cleaner.

        I know, it's nit-picking, but since there's a bug in the widget code I though maybe this can be cleaned up in the same go-around.

        ![Screen Shot 2012-05-28 at 10.47.59.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2012-05-28 at 10.47.59.png)
        ![Screen Shot 2012-05-28 at 10.47.59.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2012-05-28 at 10.47.59.png_thumb)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          I've been working on that widget and I hadn't noticed the first behavior, but I'll check it over again now. I probably just missed a closing tag somewhere.

          As for the tab width, none of our tabs fill the whole width, they are all only as big as the text within them requires, to expand their width would be inconsistent with the rest of the UI.

          Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            Yep, just a missing closing tag..
            https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense/commit/454ea767609ea3e679e0de4ec795532e66c7ce47

            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • rcfaR
              rcfa
              last edited by

              @jimp:

              I've been working on that widget and I hadn't noticed the first behavior, but I'll check it over again now. I probably just missed a closing tag somewhere.

              Figured something like that, but since I don't know the code I thought better describe the issue than muse about it's cause ;)

              @jimp:

              As for the tab width, none of our tabs fill the whole width, they are all only as big as the text within them requires, to expand their width would be inconsistent with the rest of the UI.

              You're right. I guess on the full-width pages, with e.g. three tabs, it would ridiculous to divide the space into three huge tabs, so that never caught my eye, because there it looks right. On the other hand three tabs and a stubby bit of space left over, seems to scream to divide the space among all tabs and even it out.
              But I guess being consistent is better, even if it looks a bit odd in this case.

              Still wonder though what's the issue with the columns not lining up properly between titles and the list.
              Are these separate tables? Because a single table with a row of title cells and N-rows of list cells, I wouldn't expect to behave like that, unless Firefox is a bit wonky there.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                It's not a table there, but a bunch of div tags, sometimes they need some minor adjustments of a pixel or two to line up. Though they lined up for me when I looked it over.

                Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • rcfaR
                  rcfa
                  last edited by

                  @jimp:

                  It's not a table there, but a bunch of div tags, sometimes they need some minor adjustments of a pixel or two to line up. Though they lined up for me when I looked it over.

                  Maybe funky stuff happens when the description text doesn't naturally fit into the provided space? The destination host name is somewhat long in my case, as is the description text.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.