Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Could be useful…....or not ;-)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved HA/CARP/VIPs
    1 Posts 1 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Juve
      last edited by

      As there are some hidden firewall rules I was asking myself if it shouldn't be useful to add special ones when using CARP. I'm thinking of NO NAT ones ;-)
      When using CARP I see no reasons that CARP broadcasts (directed to 224.0.0.18) should be nated.
      I "think" it should be useful to hard code a no nat rule per physical interface where a CARP interface is defined. For example :
      no nat from <iface ip="">to 224.0.0.18

      Am I wrong…..have you an example where natting the VRRP broadcast should be useful ?</iface>

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.