Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Snort 2.9.2.3 pkg v. 2.4.2 Issues

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    116 Posts 19 Posters 33.5k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Cino
      last edited by

      snort dies when blocking is enabled

      
      Jul 12 20:28:37 	snort[4131]: FATAL ERROR: s2c_pf_block() => ioctl() DIOCRADDADDRS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
      Jul 12 20:28:37 	snort[4131]: FATAL ERROR: s2c_pf_block() => ioctl() DIOCRADDADDRS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
      
      
      
      1 	1 	TCP 	GPL SHELLCODE x86 inc ebx NOOP 	Executable Code was Detected 	31.13.69.42 	80 	-> 	68.172.210.112 	56586 	1:1390:6 	07/12-20:28:37
      
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        eri--
        last edited by

        @Cino:

        snort dies when blocking is enabled

        
        Jul 12 20:28:37 	snort[4131]: FATAL ERROR: s2c_pf_block() => ioctl() DIOCRADDADDRS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
        Jul 12 20:28:37 	snort[4131]: FATAL ERROR: s2c_pf_block() => ioctl() DIOCRADDADDRS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
        
        
        
        1 	1 	TCP 	GPL SHELLCODE x86 inc ebx NOOP 	Executable Code was Detected 	31.13.69.42 	80 	-> 	68.172.210.112 	56586 	1:1390:6 	07/12-20:28:37
        
        

        All that are expiriencing this ioctl issue can confirm that are on 2.1?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          eri--
          last edited by

          @dwood:

          Getting this on AMD64 2.0.1 with a clean install of 2.4.2:

          Jul 12 21:34:54 php: /snort/snort_interfaces.php: Interface Rule START for CABLE(re1)…
          Jul 12 21:34:54 snort[8220]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_7680_re1/snort.conf(101) Maximum number of loaded libriaries of this dynamic library type exceeded: 16.
          Jul 12 21:34:54 snort[8220]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_7680_re1/snort.conf(101) Maximum number of loaded libriaries of this dynamic library type exceeded: 16.

          Snort exits on this.

          If I uncheck a few .so rules (love the new categories interface!) Snort will start.  Is this by design?

          Cheers,
          Dennis.

          Can you post your config dwood?
          Also does this happen if you start/stop snort or just on a restart after update?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            chowtamah
            last edited by

            Updated snort to Snort 2.9.2.3 pkg v. 2.4.2

            Interface looks good!

            It is working fine. But when I start snort, I get this message in System Logs.

            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: Initializing daemon mode
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: Initializing daemon mode
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: Acquiring network traffic from "em0".
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: Acquiring network traffic from "em0".
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: The DAQ version does not support reload.
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: The DAQ version does not support reload.
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: pcap DAQ configured to passive.
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: pcap DAQ configured to passive.
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: [ Number of null byte prefixed patterns trimmed: 172 ]
            Jul 13 10:12:20 snort[32688]: [ Number of null byte prefixed patterns trimmed: 172 ]

            Is it ok?

            2.0.2-RELEASE (amd64)  &  2.2.2-RELEASE (amd64)

            Always trying to learn!!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • F
              fragged
              last edited by

              I think that line about DAQ has been there for a long long time. It should still work just fine.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                HOD
                last edited by

                I did a complete reinstall of snort (10min ago) and i have the same error of my last post.

                snort[23088]: FATAL ERROR: s2c_parse_load_wl() => Invalid data in whitelist file: Invalid argument

                @ermal:

                For all the others having issues with blocking please whenever you have system log of 'unable to parse', get the file under the /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_$iface*/$whitelistname and post it here.

                cat /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_18407_pppoe0/whitlsit
                suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 2
                suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 31
                suppress gen_id 119, sig_id 32
                suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 3
                suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 6
                suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 8
                suppress gen_id 120, sig_id 10
                suppress gen_id 122, sig_id 26
                suppress gen_id 137, sig_id 1

                greetz HOD

                EDIT: my System 2.0.1-RELEASE (amd64) Snort 2.9.2.3 pkg v. 2.4.2

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Cino
                  last edited by

                  @ermal:

                  All that are expiriencing this ioctl issue can confirm that are on 2.1?

                  2.1-BETA0 (i386)
                  built on Tue Jul 3 17:55:18 EDT 2012
                  FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3

                  I'm about to upgrade to the latest snap here shortly

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    mschiek01
                    last edited by

                    @ermal:

                    @Cino:

                    snort dies when blocking is enabled

                    
                    Jul 12 20:28:37 	snort[4131]: FATAL ERROR: s2c_pf_block() => ioctl() DIOCRADDADDRS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
                    Jul 12 20:28:37 	snort[4131]: FATAL ERROR: s2c_pf_block() => ioctl() DIOCRADDADDRS: Inappropriate ioctl for device
                    
                    
                    
                    1 	1 	TCP 	GPL SHELLCODE x86 inc ebx NOOP 	Executable Code was Detected 	31.13.69.42 	80 	-> 	68.172.210.112 	56586 	1:1390:6 	07/12-20:28:37
                    
                    

                    All that are expiriencing this ioctl issue can confirm that are on 2.1?

                    Ermal

                    I have not seen this error at all. I am on amd64 2.01

                    However snort does stop with blocking enabled here is the latest:

                    Jul 13 01:33:29 kernel: pid 56726 (snort), uid 0: exited on signal 11
                    Jul 13 01:33:29 snort[56726]: [1:2001219:18] ET SCAN Potential SSH Scan [Classification: Attempted Information Leak] [Priority: 2] {TCP}
                    Jul 13 01:33:29 snort[56726]: [1:2001219:18] ET SCAN Potential SSH Scan [Classification: Attempted Information Leak] [Priority: 2] {TCP}
                    Jul 13 01:07:04 kernel: pid 11612 (snort), uid 0: exited on signal 11
                    Jul 13 01:07:04 snort[11612]: [1:2406223:287] ET RBN Known Russian Business Network IP UDP (112) [Classification: Misc Attack] [Priority: 2] {UDP}
                    Jul 13 01:07:04 snort[11612]: [1:2406223:287] ET RBN Known Russian Business Network IP UDP (112) [Classification: Misc Attack]

                    Snort is running on two external interfaces.

                    Here is the log:

                    [] [1:2001219:18] ET SCAN Potential SSH Scan []
                    [Classification: Attempted Information Leak] [Priority: 2]
                    07/13-01:33:29.677163 211.147.3.19:57698 -> nnn.nnn.4.162:22
                    TCP TTL:109 TOS:0x0 ID:31314 IpLen:20 DgmLen:48
                    *****S Seq: 0x3DBFE47C  Ack: 0x678A7406  Win: 0xFFFF  TcpLen: 28
                    TCP Options (4) => MSS: 1460 NOP NOP SackOK
                    [Xref => http://doc.emergingthreats.net/2001219][Xref => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brute_force_attack]

                    [] [1:2406223:287] ET RBN Known Russian Business Network IP UDP (112) []
                    [Classification: Misc Attack] [Priority: 2]
                    07/13-01:07:04.034851 204.124.182.253:53 -> nn.nn.107.97:25021
                    UDP TTL:52 TOS:0x20 ID:0 IpLen:20 DgmLen:71 DF
                    Len: 43
                    [Xref => http://doc.emergingthreats.net/bin/view/Main/RussianBusinessNetwork]

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • F
                      Fesoj
                      last edited by

                      ermal,

                      I'd rather fixed the ioctl problem, but the clearing issue is within my capabilities. See whether you can live with this (/usr/local/www/snort/snort_alerts.php, line 82ff):

                      if ($_GET['action'] == "clear" || $_POST['delete']) {
                        $log_this = FALSE;
                        $fname = '/tmp/snort_alerts_clear.txt';
                        foreach ($a_instance as $id => $instance) {
                          $snort_uuid_loop = $instance['uuid'];
                          $if_real_loop = snort_get_real_interface($instance['interface']);
                          if ($log_this) {
                            file_put_contents($fname, "if_real = $if_real_loop\r\nsnort_uuid = $snort_uuid_loop\r\n", FILE_APPEND);
                          }
                          if (file_exists("/var/log/snort/snort_{$if_real_loop}{$snort_uuid_loop}/alert")) {
                            if ($log_this) {
                              file_put_contents($fname, "alert file = /var/log/snort/snort_{$if_real_loop}{$snort_uuid_loop}/alert\r\n\r\n", FILE_APPEND);
                            }
                            conf_mount_rw();
                            snort_post_delete_logs($snort_uuid_loop);
                            @file_put_contents("/var/log/snort/snort_{$if_real_loop}{$snort_uuid_loop}/alert", "");
                            /* XXX: This is needed is snort is run as snort user */
                            //mwexec('/usr/sbin/chown snort:snort /var/log/snort/*', true);
                            mwexec('/bin/chmod 660 /var/log/snort/*', true);
                            mwexec("/bin/pkill -HUP -F {$g['varrun_path']}/snort_{$if_real_loop}{$snort_uuid_loop}.pid -a");
                            conf_mount_ro();
                          }
                        }
                        header("Location: /snort/snort_alerts.php?instance={$instanceid}");
                        exit;
                      }
                      
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        dwood
                        last edited by

                        Ermal, with regard to post #42, what config file are you looking for?  If you can provide a path/name I'll post the file.  I did install 2.4.2 with previous save settings toggled off.  I also ran  find /* | grep -i snort | xargs rm -rv to remove any snort references after removing the previous version.  This is as clean an install I can figure out :-)

                        The error I posted occurs when attempting to start snort, either manually or after an update:

                        Jul 12 21:34:54    php: /snort/snort_interfaces.php: Interface Rule START for CABLE(re1)…
                        Jul 12 21:34:54    snort[8220]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_7680_re1/snort.conf(101) Maximum number of loaded libriaries of this dynamic library type exceeded: 16.
                        Jul 12 21:34:54    snort[8220]: FATAL ERROR: /usr/local/etc/snort/snort_7680_re1/snort.conf(101) Maximum number of loaded libriaries of this dynamic library type exceeded: 16.

                        Other than this error..corrected by unchecking two .so rules, 2.4.2 has been running and blocking fine on two live AMD64 2.01 installations.

                        EDIT:  It looks like both installations of 2.4.2 failed to start after a daily scheduled update.  Starting interfaces manually worked OK.

                        Cheers,
                        Dennis.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          eri--
                          last edited by

                          Please reinstall again!
                          You need a new snort binary for the alerts to be displayed correctly.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • F
                            fragged
                            last edited by

                            Snort won't start after a reinstallation.

                            
                            [2.0.1-RELEASE][admin@pfsense.localdomain]/root(33): /usr/local/bin/snort
                            /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libdnet.1: unsupported file layout
                            
                            

                            I've tried to pkg_delete libdnet and install snort again, but it still won't work. Is the package broken?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              mdima
                              last edited by

                              Also this: after an update, at the first event it looks crashing:

                              Jul 14 12:08:36	kernel: pid 47584 (snort), uid 0: exited on signal 11
                              Jul 14 12:08:36	snort[47584]: [1:2404102:2763] ET CNC Zeus/Spyeye/Palevo Tracker Reported CnC Server TCP (group 2) [Classification: A Network Trojan was Detected] [Priority: 1] {TCP} 212.239.73.15:22445 -> 141.8.224.61:25
                              Jul 14 12:08:36	snort[47584]: [1:2404102:2763] ET CNC Zeus/Spyeye/Palevo Tracker Reported CnC Server TCP (group 2) [Classification: A Network Trojan was Detected] [Priority: 1] {TCP} 212.239.73.15:22445 -> 141.8.224.61:25
                              

                              Ciao,
                              Michele

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                eri--
                                last edited by

                                mdima nothing else on the logs?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • J
                                  judex
                                  last edited by

                                  I do not exactly know, if this is a feature or a bug:

                                  When I leave Home NEt set as default in the GUI the Home Net variable is automagically set in the interfaces snort.conf.
                                  There the whole subnet of the WAN interface gets added. Not only my WAN IP and the gateway, but the subnet with a 24 netmask. That can't be by design!?!

                                  Greetings, Judex

                                  2.1-RELEASE (amd64)
                                  built on Wed Sep 11 18:17:48 EDT 2013
                                  FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p11

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    dwood
                                    last edited by

                                    reinstalling 2.4.2, snort fails to start:

                                    *** Welcome to pfSense 2.0.1-RELEASE-pfSense (amd64) on pfsense ***

                                    [2.0.1-RELEASE][admin@pfsense.localdomain]/root(1): /usr/local/bin/snort
                                    /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libdnet.1: unsupported file layout

                                    Also, all .so rules were missing on this version, so not available to select.

                                    Cheers,
                                    Dennis.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      mdima
                                      last edited by

                                      @ermal:

                                      Please reinstall again!
                                      You need a new snort binary for the alerts to be displayed correctly.

                                      Hi Ermal, nothing else AFAIK. If you want I can send you in private the full system log where that happened (I just saved it for reference).

                                      Thanks,
                                      Michele

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • E
                                        eri--
                                        last edited by

                                        Please reinstall again in 30 minutes.
                                        You need a new binary again.

                                        I think i fixed the alert_pf issues with the ioctl.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          simby
                                          last edited by

                                          where is all snot rules? I have only 10-15 and i have premium account :(

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • E
                                            eri--
                                            last edited by

                                            @judex:

                                            I do not exactly know, if this is a feature or a bug:

                                            When I leave Home NEt set as default in the GUI the Home Net variable is automagically set in the interfaces snort.conf.
                                            There the whole subnet of the WAN interface gets added. Not only my WAN IP and the gateway, but the subnet with a 24 netmask. That can't be by design!?!

                                            Greetings, Judex

                                            Judex, it seems it was there since the beginning like this.
                                            Removed the subnet cause i do not think is right as well.

                                            Actually i am not sure if all the other interfaces ips need to be there apart the one snort is listening.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.