• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

New 2.0.2 install– interfaces don't work until tcpdump is running on them

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software
6 Posts 3 Posters 2.5k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    jmyers
    last edited by Mar 24, 2013, 6:55 AM Mar 24, 2013, 6:28 AM

    Hi All!

    I have a new install of pfsense on a P4 with 2Gb of RAM and two identical StarTech RealTek based NICs .  The hardware worked fine on an UBUNTU 12.04 server build that was a console only iptables router/firewall box.  I've recently switched over to pfsense and am having some strange problems.

    What happens is that usually, but not always, the interfaces will not work untill I've issued a tcpdump -i on each interface.  They stop working when the command is killed.

    Here's the dmesg output related to one of the cards:

    re0 <realtek 16="" 8169="" 8169s="" 8169sb(l)="" gigabit="" ethernet="" port="" 0xdd00-0xddff="" mem="" 0xfe9fde0-0xfe9fddff="" irq="" at="" device="" 4.0="" on="" pci1<br="">re0 Chip rev. 0x18000000
    re0: MAC rev. 0x00000000
    miibus0: <mii bus="">on re0
    rgephy0: <rtl8169s 1="" 8110s="" 8211b="" media="" interface="" phy="" on="" miibus0<br="">rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto
    re0: [FILTER]

    Any ideas?

    UPDATE
    This post sounds identical –
    http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=3085

    The fix there was to swap out the NICs, I guess I'll try that unless anyone has any other ideas --?</rtl8169s></mii></realtek>

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • W
      wallabybob
      last edited by Mar 24, 2013, 8:32 PM

      @jmyers:

      I have a new install of pfsense

      If you haven't already tried a snapshot build of pfSense 2.1 I suggest you do so because it contains more up to date device drivers than the pfSense 2.0.x builds.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J
        jmyers
        last edited by Mar 25, 2013, 6:12 AM Mar 25, 2013, 5:37 AM

        @wallabybob:

        @jmyers:

        I have a new install of pfsense

        If you haven't already tried a snapshot build of pfSense 2.1 I suggest you do so because it contains more up to date device drivers than the pfSense 2.0.x builds.

        Thanks!!  I tried 2.1 but with no improvement.  Same behavior.  I have replacement Intel 8390MT Pro/1000MT Gigabit PCI Ethernet Network PCI Adapter Cards on the way so hopefully they'll do the trick.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jmyers
          last edited by Mar 28, 2013, 12:18 AM

          Intel NICs did the trick!  I'm up and running with no problems.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by Mar 28, 2013, 1:14 PM

            You're much better off with Intel. Though the Realtek's could probably be coaxed into working by placing them in promiscuous mode (which is what tcpdump does), by setting up a shellcmd to run "ifconfig re0 promisc" (and another command for each additional re-based NIC in that box)

            We've seen that before with certain Realtek chips, especially in combination with other features such as VLANs, but it hasn't been common enough to warrant any kind of "official" workaround. If the NICs are that crummy, it's best to avoid using them entirely by swapping them out.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jmyers
              last edited by Mar 28, 2013, 2:54 PM

              The WAN interface would fail to get an address often as well, with the Intel cards it's been smooth straight away.  Thanks again for the help all!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              1 out of 6
              • First post
                1/6
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
                This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
                consent.not_received