Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    Static Routes being ignored?

    Routing and Multi WAN
    2
    3
    1977
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      carlos.papaiz last edited by

      Static Routes being ignored?

      Hey guys.. first time on the forum here…
      I guess i am doing something pretty stupid somewhere, but i just cant figure out what. maybe someone here can help me understand....

      I have this scenario where i must connect to a few private networks, each one on its own subnet.

      My problem now is outbound related, so i wont bother about inbound now.

      What is expected:
      From networks 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.5.0/24 reach every other network.(ping, http, ssh, etc…)

      What is happening:

      Where the problem seems to be:
      P5 - Main Router

      So, given this scenario, here are a few configuration screens from P5:

      Routes

      Firewall Rules

      Rede0 = 192.168.0.0/24

      Rede5 = 192.168.5.0/24

      Rede10 = 192.168.10.0/24

      Besides that, this is what i got in the console from : netstat -rn -f inet
      Routing tables

      Internet:
      Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
      default            192.168.10.1       UGS         0  1941419    em0
      10.0.0.0/8         192.168.10.11      UGS         0      173    em0
      125.255.24.14/32   192.168.10.11      UGS         0        0    em0
      127.0.0.1          link#7             UH          0      200    lo0
      172.22.44.55/32    192.168.10.10      UGS         0        6    em0
      172.30.250.132/30  192.168.10.10      UGS         0       10    em0
      189.23.87.97/32    192.168.10.11      UGS         0        0    em0
      192.168.0.0/24     link#3             U           0  1795277    em2
      192.168.0.1        link#3             UHS         0        0    lo0
      192.168.1.0/24     192.168.0.7        UGS         0 119281634    em2
      192.168.5.0/24     link#2             U           0 75373930    em1
      192.168.5.1        link#2             UHS         0        0    lo0
      192.168.10.0/24    link#1             U           0   217762    em0
      192.168.10.7       link#1             UHS         0        0    lo0

      some tests on P5 console:

      TRACEROUTE - CORRECT

      traceroute to 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8), 1 hops max, 52 byte packets
      1  192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1)  0.661 ms  0.360 ms  0.443 ms

      TRACEROUTE - WRONG!!!
      traceroute to 172.30.250.133 (172.30.250.133), 1 hops max, 52 byte packets
      1  192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1)  1.073 ms  0.749 ms  1.080 ms

      traceroute to 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1), 1 hops max, 52 byte packets
      1  192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1)  0.442 ms  0.318 ms  0.449 ms

      Pinging gateways..

      PING 192.168.10.10 (192.168.10.10): 56 data bytes
      64 bytes from 192.168.10.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.255 ms
      64 bytes from 192.168.10.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.879 ms
      ^C
      –- 192.168.10.10 ping statistics ---
      2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
      round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.879/1.067/1.255/0.188 ms

      PING 192.168.10.11 (192.168.10.11): 56 data bytes
      64 bytes from 192.168.10.11: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.306 ms
      64 bytes from 192.168.10.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.909 ms
      ^C
      --- 192.168.10.11 ping statistics ---
      2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
      round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.909/1.107/1.306/0.199 ms

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        carlos.papaiz last edited by

        I added floating Rules to do this, and it worked. My problem is solved and that how it is going to be…

        BUT:

        Shouldn´t it have worked the previous way?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          rikkifills last edited by

          Hi all.

          i am new to pfs. i am trying to block all ports and only allow the neccesary ports that i need on our network such as port 80,443, pop3, smtp etc. its about the rule under Firewall. how is the sequence work with the floating rules? is it reading from top to bottom or bottom to top? pls help.

          rikki

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post