IPSec tunnel and dinamic IP

sullrich

Dyanmic IPSEC support is already in -HEAD and RELENG_1_3; imported from m0n0wall recently.

ullbergm

@sullrich:

Dyanmic IPSEC support is already in -HEAD and RELENG_1_3; imported from m0n0wall recently.

Cool, no need for the workaround then.

ssbaksa

@sullrich:

Dyanmic IPSEC support is already in -HEAD and RELENG_1_3; imported from m0n0wall recently.

Yupiiiii!!!
This is great news. No nead to write scripts for that any more then.

TNX!

ssbaksa

@sullrich:

Dyanmic IPSEC support is already in -HEAD and RELENG_1_3; imported from m0n0wall recently.

And how can I download image with that modifications? I isn't at location usualy allowed to us mortals.
I know that it is in alpha stage (or near that) but I will like to play with.

sullrich

We currently do not have images for this. Expect to see some betas/alphas right after 1.2 is released.

ssbaksa

@sullrich:

We currently do not have images for this. Expect to see some betas/alphas right after 1.2 is released.

OK!
TNX for info.

valnar

If a script, or better yet, an update to the web interface would allow this hack to get two dynamic DNS Pfsense boxes to build a IPSEC tunnel, I would be happy to pay a bounty for that.

Robert

sullrich

@valnar:

If a script, or better yet, an update to the web interface would allow this hack to get two dynamic DNS Pfsense boxes to build a IPSEC tunnel, I would be happy to pay a bounty for that.

I don't see any reason why these changes would not work in this case. It might take a minute or two for the other end to come back up, but in theory it should work.

wallacebw

I guess there is no plan to backport the m0n0wall update into the 1.2 branch is there?

sullrich

1.2 is frozen.