Navigation

    Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search

    Future of routing?

    2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    2
    3
    1488
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      rcfa last edited by

      Not strictly a 2.1 question, particularly since we're in feature-freeze mode, but I noticed that the OpenBGPD and (of course) OpenOSPFD can't coexist with the Quagga OSPF package. This means no way to have both BGP and OSPF routing on the same box, which although I luckily don't need that currently, would seem to be a bad long-term situation.

      Checking out the Quagga web page ( http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/ ), it seems that Quagga is intended to be a general-purpose routing package, including BGP, OSPF, RIP (in a variety of incarnations), etc.

      So wouldn't it make sense to eventually move to use Quagga for all routing?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimp
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate last edited by

        Eventually it would be nice to have Quagga handle all of the protocols that its daemon is capable of handling, but that takes time, testing, and code that are in short supply.

        With PBIs on 2.1 the conflict isn't quite so bad since the PBIs are separate if the full path to the binaries can be used and there should be no conflict.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R
          rcfa last edited by

          This might make a nice addition to pfSense, too:

          http://www.openlisp.org/

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locator/Identifier_Separation_Protocol

          Put a corresponding post into the packages wishlist thread…

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post