Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    IPSEC and ROUTING or RESOLUTION LOST

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IPsec
    1 Posts 1 Posters 1.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      pinoyboy
      last edited by

      There are so many IPSEC posting that are related that I decided to capture my test results here under terms using IPSEC, ROUTING, NAME RESOLUTION, DNS, PING, etc.

      You can review my recent postings from 7/7/2013-7/8/2013 to see the various details and permutations of my testing.

      Essentially, here is my finding (supported in redmine posts also):

      I have been using 1.2.3, 2.0.3, and latest snapshot as my SOURCE at home to connect to DESTINATIONS sites ranging from pfSense 1.2.3 to 2.0.3.  No problem connecting to 1.2.3 remote sites via IPSEC.  I finally reproduced consistently that destination must be 2.0.3 (perhaps the 2.x tree even ) for IPSEC connection to eventually time out; where connection still works but no routing or name resolution occur after second reconnect attempt (after several minutes).

      If my source is DD-WRT, it does not matter whether I am connecting to destination 1.2.3 or 2.0.3, it works always.  I tried all types of Shrewsoft client settings and pfSense settings (type of cipher, DPD, NAT-T, etc - results are the same).  You must restart racoon service to get back to normal.

      You can reproduce this IPSEC issue by being behind 1.2.3 - to current snapshot and you connect to a remote 2.x site using Shrewsoft VPN client and waiting to reconnect 5 minutes or later - you will lose routing and obviously name resolution.  From my readings here, this not only affects IPSEC client connections, but even IPSEC VPN Site to site (I have not personally tested this scenario).  I am done testing this - I am 100% certain of this issue.

      http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1351 still exists and is confirmed.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.