Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Nginx driven website browsing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General pfSense Questions
    3 Posts 2 Posters 1.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      brcisna
      last edited by

      Hello All,

      pfSense-2.0.1-RELEASE
      squid
      squidGuard
      lightsquid
      multi-wan  failover load balancing

      I done a search here of course first,but could not find any hits relevant.

      Has anyone here experienced any oddities when trying to browse nginx powered websites using pfSense-2.0.1.
      Sometimes when browsing these sites the page is all "scrambled,,and randomly get the "405 not allowed"/blank web page
      I did list a couple of these sites in the squid  bypass directive but this did not make any difference
      tried Firefox and Chrome both and they seem to randomly cause these oiddities in a  different fashion.

      here are a couple URL's to try

      http://www.salvagedirect.com
      http://www.qcsadirect.com

      I have read many postings in regards to the "put" and "post" being a problem in early versions of nginx core.

      Thank You,
      Barry

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        brcisna
        last edited by

        Curious.
        Has anyone on list here tried either of the URL's i posted in the initial post of this thread?
        Results
        Our pfSense-2.0.1-RELASE  at both locations renders these websites,,,,either 'scrambled/overlayed', or  randomly gets a '405 denied' result.
        I wonder also if this could in fact be related to the database is running on these websites as even viewing at a non pfSense web browser location these sites take quite some time to set your 'search filters'.

        Thanks,
        Barry

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kejianshi
          last edited by

          This may have zero to do with it, but seems like most of the people who had issues were using dual WAN (or more)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.