Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfBlocker question

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfSense Packages
    3 Posts 2 Posters 1.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      senser
      last edited by

      From the pfBlocker GUI:

      "While creating rules with this list, keep aliasname in the beggining of rule description and do not end description with 'rule'.
      custom rules with 'Aliasname something rule' description will be removed by package."

      Would that aliasname be the alias from the "global" Alias list (eg "pfBlockerGivenAlias") or the aliasname given in the pfBlocker GUI (eg "GivenAllias")?

      Also, this is a very strange thing. Explain why it is necessary to have the aliasname in the description please. For automatic removal of rules using AliasOnly lists?

      We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        I do not think the comment is relevant any more. I certainly do not have aliasname (in neither form) in the rules description, works just fine. (Talking about "Alias only" lists.)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          senser
          last edited by

          Looks like the pfBlocker widget uses the description for matching packet stats,, if the rule does not contain the aliasname matching packets will not add to the widget counters.

          We use the mighty pf, we cannot be fooled.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • First post
            Last post
          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.