Simple fan speed control for the Firebox X750e
-
If you pull up the widget does it show the temperature or something else?
edit= Ill say that I tried to make it work with the copy of WGXepc that I had which I thought was the same and found it was wrong.
Use the copy that comes in Steves zip file.
-
If you pull up the widget does it show the temperature or something else?
edit= Ill say that I tried to make it work with the copy of WGXepc that I had which I thought was the same and found it was wrong.
Use the copy that comes in Steves zip file.
It shows the temperature.
I tried the version I had installed as well and it said that WGXepc could accept multiple values or something along those lines. I figured that might be the problem so I used the one in the zip file before my first post just to make sure.
-
Are you still using commands in shellcmd or other to set fan speeds manually?
-
Are you still using commands in shellcmd or other to set fan speeds manually?
Nothing in shellcmd currently. I set it manually at the command line after first trying the fanctrl.sh command and the fan shot up to ff. But its only been set at the command line.
I did try setting it back to ff manually and running fanctrl.sh with no noticeable drop in speed. I didnt look to see if there was a "reset to factory" for the fan speed.
-
Try running WGXepc -t to read the temperature.
If you look at the thread I linked earlier you'll see that the SuperIO chip (which has the sensor) has a habit of erroneously reporting 125C after some time. If you haven't rebooted that box for while it could just be reporting wrong.Steve
-
Try running WGXepc -t to read the temperature.
If you look at the thread I linked earlier you'll see that the SuperIO chip (which has the sensor) has a habit of erroneously reporting 125C after some time. If you haven't rebooted that box for while it could just be reporting wrong.Steve
I checked that earlier and it was the same as the gui/widget and mbmon. Firewall has only been up 3 days but I'll give it a reboot and see what happens.
-
Reboot did the trick, thanks for the help. Probably should have tried that first.
-
Just spotted the error. In my post I had the following instruction to start the fan control:
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fanctrl.sh
This is wrong. It should be:
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fanctrl.sh start
You can stop the daemon, and return the fans to full speed with the following:
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fanctrl.sh stop
Sorry about that.
Steve
-
I actually tried this
# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/fanctrl.sh stop
but didnt notice a change which makes sense because it sets the fans back to full speed where they already where.
Thanks for putting this together, I like it better than manually setting the fan speed.
-
Any idea what speed the fans average out at when the script is running?
I guess it would be very dependent on ambient temperature and cpu load but it would be interesting to hear any anecdotal evidence.Steve
-
Mine's sat at the minimum as per the constants at the top of the /usr/local/sbin/fanctrld.sh script
target=64 min_temp=40 gain=5 delay=2 min_fan=15
thus:
[2.1-RELEASE][root@pfsense]/root(8): /usr/local/bin/WGXepc -f Found Firebox X-E Fanspeed is f
It does rise during activity.
I'm nervous about setting min_fan any lower as I don't really want to stop the fans altogether.
Steve
-
I should explain that min_fan setting. There are three fans in the box, two of which primarily cool the CPU, but both those and the third fan also exhaust warm air drawing cooler air over all the other components. I therefore thought it best to keep some airflow even when the CPU was below the target temperature on 64 degC. It doesn't take much airflow to provide noticeable cooling.
Steve
-
Ah interesting, F is really quite slow.
Does your script use decimal conversion, F=15?Steve
-
The lines that write the value do the conversion thus:
# Adjust the fan speed /usr/local/bin/WGXepc -f `printf "%x\n" $fan` > /dev/null
The machine isn't under much load most of the time, but even when doing big downloads it still runs quite cool. Accessing the web interface, most notably the RRD Graphs causes a speed up of the fans.
Steve
-
Ah. I managed to mangle my hex and decimal values a few times when writing the WGXepc program (I'm no programmer!) with 'interesting' results. ::)
I was also concerned about cooling the rest of the box, the PSU seemed to run particularly hot. I measured it using a pyrometer since I'm pretty sure parts of it could kill you. The cooling provisions on the box in general don't seem that great especially if it's in a rack, I'd like to see some vents in the front panel to allow cool air in. I have my boxes set to fan speed 32, none have stopped working yet. It really is a shame they didn't spend the extra pennies required to put in a SuperIO chip that had auto fan control.
Steve
-
Hi Steve,
I installed your scripts and the modified toll from Steve with the temperatue option.
After reboot I noticed that the fans slow down but after some time the temperature reads 35 C and the fans are up at speed FF.The fans are always running at this speed. I noticed no change here. What is wrong? I also tried the corrected call with the start option
Matthias
-
OK, found the error by myself. The min temperature is set to 40. Mine its 35. So the if-statement is not correct. I set the min temp to 30, now it is running!
Maybe it is a good idea to refactor the if statement…
Matthias
-
Hi Matthias,
I saw your first post emailed to my phone and thought that looked like the script had taken the safety bailout. This is there to protect from erroneous temperature readings I'd been warned of, and too high a fan speed in the safe response to that.
Interesting that your box is running so cool. I've never seen mine below 50 degC. By the time its booted to the point the script starts the CPU is normally up to that kind of temperature.
Steve
-
Hi Steve,
my box is in a network cabinet. There is not much space at the back for the air to come out (approx. 5 cm to the rear of the cabinet.
I am wondering myself why it is so cool! Now with your script it runs with speed f at temp 40 C.
It is ok, I think.Bye
Matthias -
What CPUs are you running? Is the cpu sensor touching the bottom 9f the CPU? I can't actually remember if it has a spring loaded sensor or not. :-\
Steve