Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    1:1 confusion

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved NAT
    9 Posts 4 Posters 3.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R Offline
      risotto
      last edited by

      I'm trying to set up 1:1 NAT for a handful of addresses. My edge network is a /29 with 5 usable IPs. Three of those IPs I would like to 1:1 map to internal IPs, let's call one of them 173.249.128.131/32 to 10.0.10.100/32 .

      I've set up a Virtual IP (which I read was required on some wikis) as an IP Alias and also created a 1:1 mapping with an external IP of 173.249.128.131 to the internal ip of 10.0.10.100. Destination IP I don't understand what it is meant for (and I couldn't find conclusive docs on this either), so I left it default to * (any).

      In addition I've created a couple firewall rules on the WAN interface to allow traffic to the internal ip 10.0.10.100 on various ports.

      When setting up one of these mappings, everything is fine and the 1:1 map works as expected. When I however go ahead and add one more external address, such as 173.249.128.132/32 mapping to 10.0.10.110/32, all traffic for 173.249.128.131 now seems to go to 10.0.10.110. That's obviously not my intention.

      Am I doing something wrong or did I just find a bug? The version of pfsense I'm running is 2.1-RC1 (amd64)
      built on Sat Aug 10 05:22:30 EDT 2013 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p9. This is a nano 4g image.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        timthetortoise
        last edited by

        The destination IP should be the one that traffic is hitting.

        So if you want traffic from 1.2.3.4 to go to 192.168.1.1, you'd configure:
        External Subnet IP: 1.2.3.4
        Internal IP: 192.168.1.1/32
        Destination: 1.2.3.4/32

        If you also want 1.2.3.5 to go to 192.168.1.2, you'd configure:
        External Subnet IP: 1.2.3.5
        Internal IP: 192.168.1.2/32
        Destination: 1.2.3.5/32

        Though I can't test this at the moment, I can pretty much guarantee this is how it is supposed to be configured.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          risotto
          last edited by

          That worked.

          Would you mind explaining why the external address and destination address are both needed? What's the scenario the two would be different, or where destination would actually be "any", as suggested in the field's description?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T Offline
            timthetortoise
            last edited by

            My guess would be if you had a pool of addresses you wanted to go to the same host. I'm honestly not sure, as I haven't ever had a need for it.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ Offline
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              The destination is just that, the destination of the traffic, but you're thinking of the wrong direction, it's not inbound, that's for outbound.

              If Internal IP x.x.x.x goes to destination y.y.y.y, apply 1:1 NAT so it comes from external address z.z.z.z

              IIRC it works the opposite way as well:

              If a "destination" IP y.y.y.y tries to contact external IP z.z.z.z, apply 1:1 NAT so it gets sent to internal IP x.x.x.x

              I'd have to double check that last bit though.

              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K Offline
                Kidlike
                last edited by

                Forgive my ignorance, but I read somewhere that you need to have a physical interface for each 1:1 mapping…

                I suppose that is not correct. Please enlighten me...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ Offline
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  It is not correct. You do need a VIP in most cases but not all.

                  Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K Offline
                    Kidlike
                    last edited by

                    Thank you.. Still not working though :(

                    From the pfsense's ssh I can see that the wan IP i have set for the 1:1 mapping is used by pfsense itself and not being forwarded to the lan IP.

                    Any ideas ?

                    ( should I post more? or open a new thread? :] )

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K Offline
                      Kidlike
                      last edited by

                      Nevermind.. it started working. I suppose it was an issue from my "wan" that is actually a nat to someone else.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.